It's always nice to see Catherine, isn't it? Especially as it's so rare to do so. What with her wanting to take her time and ease into royal duties. We can't be blamed for taking what we can get in between.
Catherine reportedly spent 4 hours at the salon. How do we know she was there? Because there's a photo of her getting her hair blow dried. This photo was taken through a window. Whose fault is it that she was photographed? The paparazzi who took the picture? Or is it Catherine's for not sitting in a more private location?
Judging by the comments people like seeing her. But yet there are also comments invoking Diana. Her life is a parable for what can go wrong. But pointing this out is a downer. Like playing outside and being reminded you have homework. It spoils the fun. Off duty photos are harmless, aren't they? Besides, what are the chances it could happen again?
As you read this article there's no need to comment on the hypocrisy. I know I am not innocent of wanting to know about Catherine. Nor about using her as material for my blogs. I follow her because she is, currently, the most interesting member of the royal family. A royal superstar. Therefore I can't take the high road. Because then it wouldn't allow me to question what's wrong with it.
However I'm also not alone in my interest. But where do you draw the line? The bedroom? Bathroom?Is she supposed to stay in her remote cottage/palace and become a recluse? She may have signed up for a life in the spotlight, but when did saying 'Catherine's privacy' become incongruous?
I'm drawing my line in the sand at photographs taken through windows or when she's off duty.
Where do you draw yours?
© Marilyn Braun 2011
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Contact Form
Featured Post
If being royal is so extraordinary, why do the royals want to be ordinary?
Being royal is clearly not all it is cracked up to be. Gilt here and there. Liveried footmen abound. Church bells ring on your birthday. Red...
Search This Blog
Popular Posts
-
She was born on April 25, 1897 in Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee year. Queen Victoria called her "My dear little Jubilee baby...
-
Y'know, I don't have a problem with artwork. As a matter of fact, I go to the museum at least a couple of times a year to make mysel...
-
The final arrival in the royal marriage race that began with the death of Princess Charlotte in 1817, she was a first cousin of Queen Victor...
-
Periodically you will see a variation of this question in media articles, usually when there's no news to report. However, by asking thi...
-
Diana, Princess of Wales has recently been named on Time Europe magazine's issue 60 Years of Heroes. Personally I was quite surprised at...
-
Since the reign of King George IV, most sovereigns have created a form of royal family order for members of the royal family, usually female...
-
"Diamonds are a girl's best friend", and so the song goes. But royal engagement rings are somewhat different. Despite some fab...
-
I'm expecting my second child in early December (when I'll have time to update this blog, and look after a toddler and newborn is so...
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(130)
-
▼
September
(10)
- Has Catherine's privacy become a royal paradox?
- The Royal Report for Sunday September 25, 2011 - I...
- Royal Review: Bright Young Royals by Jerramy Fine
- Why training Catherine to be Royal is a bad idea
- The Royal Report for Sunday September 18, 2011 - R...
- 5 Reasons I don't want to be like Kate Middleton
- Royal Fashionistas
- The Royal Report for Sunday September 11, 2011 - H...
- My Royal Sanctuary
- Royal News Generator 2.1
-
▼
September
(10)
No comments:
Post a Comment