Prince Harry recently celebrated his 21st birthday, and in right royal tradition, he marked it by giving an interview and releasing photos; shot by non other than photographer extraordinaire Mario Testino. The Queen, when she was Princess Elizabeth, celebrated her 21st birthday in South Africa. While there, she made a broadcast, her historic act of dedication. So far she's lived up to her words and hasn't disappointed us yet.
I'm not trying to minimize Prince Harry's big event by comparing it to his grandmother because there is no comparison. His grandmother was heiress presumptive to the throne, Harry is only the spare. You know, the one you hope you'll never have to use but take comfort it's there if you need it. Remember how difficult it was to change it last time, why would we want to go through the whole hassle all over again?
Prince Harry, in contrast, chose to set the record straight about his feelings for Camilla. Did we really expect any dedication from him? Unlike his grandmother, whose words still resonate 60 years on, Harry's 21st birthday interview will be remembered for his comments on Camilla. Of course he said other things: continuing his mother's work with AIDS, his relationship with his brother, how wonderful his girlfriend is, his military career, the Nazi incident; he covered a lot of territory. But back to Camilla.
I think a lot of us are happy that he addressed the Camilla issue. Someone on the inside track gave us some clarification and finally brought us some closure. However, for some people it raised more questions - was he coached? did he really mean what he said? Why should we trust the judgement of someone who in the past has clearly demonstrated a lack of it?
If he didn't mean it, we can then discuss his motivations behind making these statements. Scheming Harry, trying to draw attention away from the other things he's done. Does he really love her to bits? What does 'loving to bits' actually mean? Maybe we could discuss why we're still discussing this.
If he did mean it, then what are we going to talk about? What an upstanding young man he is to compliment his step-mother, stand behind her? No, that's not very interesting. What now? we'll have nothing! Prince Charles is happy, Camilla is striking the right fashion notes, Prince William is on the right track with his girlfriend. It was so much easier when Camilla was the "wicked step-mother". How could Harry do this to us?
Either way, can we all get on with our lives? After all, there are much more important things to talk about: Kate Moss, David and Victoria Beckham, Britney Spears' new baby, the Crown Princess of the Netherlands choice of hats. So, we're not at a complete loss.
The choice is ours to discuss.
© Marilyn Braun 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Contact Form
Featured Post
If being royal is so extraordinary, why do the royals want to be ordinary?
Being royal is clearly not all it is cracked up to be. Gilt here and there. Liveried footmen abound. Church bells ring on your birthday. Red...
Search This Blog
- Embed from Getty...Sep 19 2022 | Read more
- Lambert, CC BY-SA 2.0 , WikipediaAs details emerge regarding Queen...Sep 14 2022 | Read more
- The Queen died on Thursday, September 8th. At 96, it wasn't a shock....Sep 11 2022 | Read more
- As an avid follower of the British royal family, I have seen more...May 03 2022 | Read more
- As with anything Harry and Meghan do, when they named their newborn...Jun 09 2021 | Read more
Popular Posts
-
Recent reports indicate that Prince William and Kate Middleton are back together. Earlier in the year, speculation was rife that an engageme...
-
Periodically you will see a variation of this question in media articles, usually when there's no news to report. However, by asking thi...
-
Do you have a royal blog? Would you like to discover other cool blogs and have some fun interacting with other royal bloggers in the proces...
-
Prince Harry recently celebrated his 21st birthday, and in right royal tradition, he marked it by giving an interview and releasing photos; ...
-
I'm expecting my second child in early December (when I'll have time to update this blog, and look after a toddler and newborn is so...
-
"I am researching the preferred day of the week for Royal Weddings. I understand that Thursdays were the preferred day." Royal we...
-
Y'know, I don't have a problem with artwork. As a matter of fact, I go to the museum at least a couple of times a year to make mysel...
-
For the last few days I've read plenty of articles deploring the coverage of Catherine Cambridge's topless photos. Some vehemently b...
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(87)
-
▼
September
(14)
- Royal Profile: Princess Victoria Alexandra
- Royal Births
- Royal Profile: Prince Henry, Duke of Gloucester
- The Spare and Camilla
- Royal Profile Subjects
- Royal Trivia
- Royal Profile: Princess Patricia of Connaught
- A Cinderella Story
- Royal Profile: Birgitte, Duchess of Gloucester
- Recommended Royalty Sites
- Royal Profile: Princess Marie Louise
- Royal Profile: Sophie, Countess of Wessex
- Green Eyes and Jam
- Royal Profile: Princess Alice, Countess of Athlone
-
▼
September
(14)
No comments:
Post a Comment