Occasionally I ask myself, (well, actually it was only this morning) why do I choose the subjects that I do for my royal profiles? After all, most people wouldn't go looking for Prince Michael of Kent or Princess Alice, Countess of Althone, or even David Linley for that matter - although some do, which is great. However, it seems that whenever someone is searching for information on a royal, it tends to be Diana, the Queen, Camilla, Charles, William, etc. Shouldn't I make my blog more informative and timely by writing seriously about these people?
Well, to focus exclusively on them would be a shame; it would be ignoring the personal history of the family. The royal family comes from a long line of fascinating people, and not to dismiss the ones BV (Before Victoria), but my main interest is in Queen Victoria's time to the present. I will occasionally mention (ok, more than occasionally) Charles, Camilla and Harry, especially when they've done something I can spoof but that's about it. I have my standards. Diana, of course, isn't doing much these days so if I do cover her, it's either for comparison purposes, or it's relevant, such as the recent anniversary of her death.
There are royals, such as the Duchess of Gloucester, who we rarely hear about and not much is known. The Princess Royal works very hard but because she's not glamorous, she's not given the notice she deserves. Some of the people I write about are relatively obscure but no less interesting. Princess Patricia was very popular in her day, and the circumstances that led to the end of Princess Marie Louise's marriage were considered scandalous in Victorian times.
I genuinely love writing about royalty and I try very hard to keep the profiles factual and stay away from rumour and conjecture. If I can't substantiate the information in some way, I don't include it in the article. So in conclusion, I hope you enjoy the royal profiles as much as I enjoy researching and writing them.
© Marilyn Braun 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Contact Form
Featured Post
If being royal is so extraordinary, why do the royals want to be ordinary?
Being royal is clearly not all it is cracked up to be. Gilt here and there. Liveried footmen abound. Church bells ring on your birthday. Red...
Search This Blog
Popular Posts
-
When Princess Charlotte is christened on Sunday July 5th, she will traditionally be given five or six godparents/sponsors. Prince William ha...
-
Definition: A queen regnant is a female ruler who reigns in her own right. Unlike a queen consort who is the spouse of the reigning king, wi...
-
View image | gettyimages.com When Lady Diana Spencer married Prince Charles in 1981, the Spencer's - one of England's preeminent ...
-
The final arrival in the royal marriage race that began with the death of Princess Charlotte in 1817, she was a first cousin of Queen Victor...
-
A member of a family that can trace their history back to the Norman Conquest, he was possessed with a fine baritone voice. When he turned d...
-
Prior the wedding I wrote a post reviewing the various royal wedding commemorative book-a-zines being sold to commemorative the royal weddi...
-
Just when we thought that things were smooth sailing for Camilla, controversy has reared its head yet again. This time its about jewelry . I...
-
Many biographies paint Prince Philip's father as a serious, distant figure who spent his life in exile as a playboy. But according to hi...
Blog Archive
-
▼
2005
(87)
-
▼
September
(14)
- Royal Profile: Princess Victoria Alexandra
- Royal Births
- Royal Profile: Prince Henry, Duke of Gloucester
- The Spare and Camilla
- Royal Profile Subjects
- Royal Trivia
- Royal Profile: Princess Patricia of Connaught
- A Cinderella Story
- Royal Profile: Birgitte, Duchess of Gloucester
- Recommended Royalty Sites
- Royal Profile: Princess Marie Louise
- Royal Profile: Sophie, Countess of Wessex
- Green Eyes and Jam
- Royal Profile: Princess Alice, Countess of Athlone
-
▼
September
(14)
No comments:
Post a Comment