The Queen and Prince Philip are in Canada for their 22nd royal tour.
(Insert stifled yawn here)
Considering that I'm covering the visit for this blog (and will continue to do so), I just can't rouse myself to feel any true excitement for the tour.
Having an 84 year old woman and her 89 year old husband displaying impressive energy and stamina when it comes to shaking multiple hands and unveiling plaques, just doesn't do it for me. It's something I noticed when Charles and Camilla visited last November. It was the same lack of excitement. Where was the glamour? The youth factor? At minimum, couldn't someone have fallen off a horse?
While it may be nice to have the Queen amongst us if only to compare her likeness to our currency, I have to ask what the point of these visits are? But then again, I had to ask what the point of the recent G20 visits were, an event that could have easily been accomplished by video teleconference equipment (yes, we have the technology!), wasted a billion dollars and led to a small group of anarchists overshadowing peaceful demonstrators with legitimate issues. Unlike the G20 world leaders, who we barely saw, the Queen does not hide behind partitions and cement barriers. We are not strongly encouraged to stay away, leaving the downtown core a ghost town. We are encouraged to come to see a woman who is the last of her kind, to celebrate her visit and to see the Queen of Canada who, as the most well-travelled monarch in history, and has seen and met more of of her subjects than any of her predecessors. While she may not enthusiastically wade into the crowds like the younger generation of royals, shaking all hands proffered, she is here, in the flesh, and visible.
When I look back on her previous visits, the first one in 1951 as Princess Elizabeth, the photos show an excitement to be marvelled at for the wrong reasons. Not to be viewed as the natural consequence of a deferential age but as a questionable response to a young woman far removed from our reality. It was inevitable that those types of reactions would reduce for subsequent royal visits. In the 1970s, when she brought her children, it increased the excitement factor. The photos from Charles and Diana's various visits show the same type of excitement and enthusiasm that was briefly repeated on Andrew and Fergie's 1987 tour, but has not been seen since then. Other royals may come and go, but it's just not the same.
With Charles and Camilla's recent tour, I chalked the lack of enthusiasm up to having the opening act instead of the star of the show perform. I had honestly thought that the Camilla curiosity factor would have increased the interest in the tour; it didn't. The lackluster response for their tour seemed to be an omen for this visit. Except in this case we have the star of the show in attendance. If the people from the 1950s were capable of viewing photos from this tour, they would marvel at our cynicism and in some cases our lack of respect.
At the risk of sounding like a monarchist - which I'm not - I'm glad she's here. I may not appreciate her visits until she's gone and that's a shame. In the future, other royals may come and go, but it just won't be the same.
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
The Royal Tour of Canada 2010 - Day Two
Continuing their stop in Halifax, Nova Scotia, The Queen and Prince Philip visit coincided with the Celebrations marking the Canadian Naval Centenial - 100 years of proud service by the Royal Canadian Navy. The Queen also has a personal interest in the Royal Canadian Navy. She is patron of The Navy League of Canada, The Royal Canadian Naval Association and The Royal Canadian Naval Benevolent Fund.
In the afternoon The Queen and The Duke of Edinburgh visited the Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Canada’s largest centre for ocean research. After this visit they board the naval frigate HMSC St John's for the International Fleet Review. This naval pageant featured about 22 foreign ships, each saluting the Queen as she passed by in the HMSC St. John's.
© Marilyn Braun 2010
All images via PicApp
Monday, June 28, 2010
The Royal Tour of Canada 2010 - Day One
Arriving on a rainy day in Halifax, Nova Scotia, the Queen carried a clear umbrella; a deliberate choice to allow people to view her despite the weather conditions. The couple are welcomed by officials, including the Hon Peter MacKay, Minister of National Defence and the Queen's personal flag is raised to signify the presence of the Queen of Canada.
Their visit starts with an official welcome ceremony to Canada and Nova Scotia, in the Garrison grounds at the foot of the Halifax Citadel Hill, a national symbol of Halifax's role as a major naval station in the British empire and in Canada's development from colony to nation. In attendance at this welcome ceremony is Prime Minister Stephen Harper, The Governor General Michaëlle Jean, and other prominent Canadian's and dignitaries. After the Prime Minister's speech, the Queen addressed the crowd:
"My mother once said that this country feels like a home away from home for the Queen. I'm delighted to be back among you all. Canadians have by their own endeavours built a society that is widely admired across the world," she said. "I am very proud of this country. Thank you for your welcome. It is very good to be home."
The Queen and Prince Philip paid a visit to a Mi'kmaq festival, and unveiled a plaque, rededicating Government House, the restored residence of Nova Scotia's lieutenant-governor — the oldest official residence in Canada, which had undergone a three-year renovation.
Their visit starts with an official welcome ceremony to Canada and Nova Scotia, in the Garrison grounds at the foot of the Halifax Citadel Hill, a national symbol of Halifax's role as a major naval station in the British empire and in Canada's development from colony to nation. In attendance at this welcome ceremony is Prime Minister Stephen Harper, The Governor General Michaëlle Jean, and other prominent Canadian's and dignitaries. After the Prime Minister's speech, the Queen addressed the crowd:
"My mother once said that this country feels like a home away from home for the Queen. I'm delighted to be back among you all. Canadians have by their own endeavours built a society that is widely admired across the world," she said. "I am very proud of this country. Thank you for your welcome. It is very good to be home."
The Lieutenant Governor of Nova Scotia, Her Honour the Honourable Mayann E. Francis, presented The Queen with the ceremonial Royal Key, made of gilt-sterling silver and engraved with The Queen’s Royal Cypher. This presentation of the key, to be returned at the end of the tour, begins a new tradition at Government House. The Royal Key will also be presented to future Lieutenant Governors and important visitors who stay at Government House.
© Marilyn Braun 2010
All images via PicApp
Sunday, June 27, 2010
The Royal Report for Sunday June 27, 2010 - Princes William and Harry, two brothers, two different destinies
In a recent joint trip to South Africa, Prince William and Prince Harry revealed their hopes and dreams for the future. Amongst Harry's: to be a ‘professional surfer’, ‘wildlife photographer’ and to live in Africa. William said that his ambition was to be 'happy, lucky, strong, caring, and a ‘successful pilot’. With their respective roles as future king and spare, which one of them has a greater chance of seeing their dreams become a reality?
Listen to the episode here
Publications mentioned
Hello! Canada No 178 28 June 2010
Blogs mentioned
British Royal Wedding
From My Royal Collection
Tiaras - A History of Splendour by Geoffrey C. Munn
Tune in to the next episode of The Royal Report on Sunday July 4, 2010 at 9:00PM EST (North America).
The topic will be: In honor of the Queen and Prince Philip's 24th royal tour of Canada, a look back at their royal visits to Canada.
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Listen to the episode here
Publications mentioned
Hello! Canada No 178 28 June 2010
Blogs mentioned
British Royal Wedding
From My Royal Collection
Tiaras - A History of Splendour by Geoffrey C. Munn
Tune in to the next episode of The Royal Report on Sunday July 4, 2010 at 9:00PM EST (North America).
The topic will be: In honor of the Queen and Prince Philip's 24th royal tour of Canada, a look back at their royal visits to Canada.
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Swedish Royal Wedding Report
Despite this, you could arguably say that royal weddings have the distinction of being universal events and this one is no exception. From the Swedish public lining the streets, some imaginatively painting their faces in blue and yellow to the distinguished and royal guests in evening dress, to the stirring music, this event transcends the language barrier by the pagentry of it. And incidently was the first royal wedding since 2008, when Denmark's Prince Joachim wed Marie Cavallier of France.
© Marilyn Braun 2010
All photos via PicApp website
Monday, June 21, 2010
Prince William and Prince Harry vs the vuvuzelas
During the England vs Algeria FIFA World Cup match in South Africa, the following conversation takes place through the buzzing of the ubiquitious blowing of vuvuzelas:
Spectator One: Did you hear that William and Harry are here today?
Spectator Two: (stops blowing his vuvuzela) WHAT?
Spectator One: WILLIAM AND HARRY ARE AT THE MATCH TODAY
Spectator Two: WHO?
Spectator One: PRINCES WILLIAM AND HARRY ARE HERE TODAY
Spectator Two: ARE YOU SURE? I DON'T SEE THEM
Spectator One: THEY'RE THE ONES NOT BLOWING VUVUZELAS

© Marilyn Braun 2010
Spectator One: Did you hear that William and Harry are here today?
Spectator Two: (stops blowing his vuvuzela) WHAT?
Spectator One: WILLIAM AND HARRY ARE AT THE MATCH TODAY
Spectator Two: WHO?
Spectator One: PRINCES WILLIAM AND HARRY ARE HERE TODAY
Spectator Two: ARE YOU SURE? I DON'T SEE THEM
Spectator One: THEY'RE THE ONES NOT BLOWING VUVUZELAS
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Sunday, June 20, 2010
The Royal Report for Sunday June 20th, 2010 - A Celebration of Prince William and Kate MIddleton's Love
On this episode: : Prince William once stated that he wouldn't consider getting married until he was at least 28. Given that he is turning 28 on June 21st, speculation will no doubt intensify about his relationship with Kate Middleton. On this episode, a celebration of Prince William and Kate Middleton's love.
You can listen to the episode here
Publications mentioned
OK Magazine - June 21, 2010 - Kate and William - The next big royal wedding
Hello! Canada Weekly No 176 14 June 2010
Hello! Canada Weekly No 177 21 June 2010
From My Royal Collection
The Face of Monarchy - British royalty portrayed - by Richard Ormond
Tune in to the next episode of The Royal Report on Sunday June 27, 2010 - 9:00PM EST (North America).
The topic will be: Prince William and Prince Harry - Two brothers, two different destinies.
© Marilyn Braun 2010
You can listen to the episode here
Publications mentioned
OK Magazine - June 21, 2010 - Kate and William - The next big royal wedding
Hello! Canada Weekly No 176 14 June 2010
Hello! Canada Weekly No 177 21 June 2010
From My Royal Collection
The Face of Monarchy - British royalty portrayed - by Richard Ormond
Tune in to the next episode of The Royal Report on Sunday June 27, 2010 - 9:00PM EST (North America).
The topic will be: Prince William and Prince Harry - Two brothers, two different destinies.
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Unfortunately Kate Middleton isn't pregnant
At least according to Star magazine she is. Yet people have come out of the woodwork, emphatically denying these reports. I, for one am thoroughly disappointed.
Mainly because it would have made the royal family far more interesting. Injected some much needed controversy. Forget the two or three days of Fergie-gate 2010, an illegitimate child would have enough mileage for the next nine months. We could blog about her motivations for getting pregnant, whether the baby is actually William's, fire up discussion boards discussing whether he will make an honest woman of her, how this will affect the line of succession, and all of the royals and courtiers who are 'incandescent with rage' and 'knashing their teeth'.
Illegitimate children are nothing new to the royal family. History is littered with them. However, in the last 100 years we've had advancements in birth control, and the rabid media interest as back-up protection. If they wanted to take the heat off of an engagement announcement, this would have been the perfect way to do it aside from breaking-up or converting to Catholicism.
Did I mention that I'm extremely disappointed?
I am wistful thinking of the possibilities. Yes, once everyone got over the initial shock of it all, we would follow the pregnancy minutely. How she would cope as a single-mother should William drop the ball, what she would be wearing, where she would have the baby, boy or girl, names, titles, official photos, genealogists would pour over the history of royal bastards. Not to mention all of the show topics it would inspire. An example - On the next Royal Report: Now that Kate is knocked-up, will she go for natural or c-section?
Alas, it looks like I'll have to wait until they're married to speculate on all of this. How boring is that? It just won't be the same. Royal history is littered with legitimate children. Case in point: aside from the Queen, what have any of them ever done? William and Kate's illegitimate baby could live under the spectre of it for the rest of his/her life because we'd be here to remind them, the psychological difficulties of living under the burden of it all, if William doesn't marry Kate, how he/she will feel about being robbed of their birthright....
*Sigh*
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Mainly because it would have made the royal family far more interesting. Injected some much needed controversy. Forget the two or three days of Fergie-gate 2010, an illegitimate child would have enough mileage for the next nine months. We could blog about her motivations for getting pregnant, whether the baby is actually William's, fire up discussion boards discussing whether he will make an honest woman of her, how this will affect the line of succession, and all of the royals and courtiers who are 'incandescent with rage' and 'knashing their teeth'.
Illegitimate children are nothing new to the royal family. History is littered with them. However, in the last 100 years we've had advancements in birth control, and the rabid media interest as back-up protection. If they wanted to take the heat off of an engagement announcement, this would have been the perfect way to do it aside from breaking-up or converting to Catholicism.
Did I mention that I'm extremely disappointed?
I am wistful thinking of the possibilities. Yes, once everyone got over the initial shock of it all, we would follow the pregnancy minutely. How she would cope as a single-mother should William drop the ball, what she would be wearing, where she would have the baby, boy or girl, names, titles, official photos, genealogists would pour over the history of royal bastards. Not to mention all of the show topics it would inspire. An example - On the next Royal Report: Now that Kate is knocked-up, will she go for natural or c-section?
Alas, it looks like I'll have to wait until they're married to speculate on all of this. How boring is that? It just won't be the same. Royal history is littered with legitimate children. Case in point: aside from the Queen, what have any of them ever done? William and Kate's illegitimate baby could live under the spectre of it for the rest of his/her life because we'd be here to remind them, the psychological difficulties of living under the burden of it all, if William doesn't marry Kate, how he/she will feel about being robbed of their birthright....
*Sigh*
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Swedish Royal Wedding fever
Official stamps? Check
Monograms unveiled? Check
Royal Barge Vasaorden on standby? Check
Members of various royal families and illustrious public figures will converge on Stockholm ready to take part in history; the first royal wedding of a female heir to the Swedish throne. Pint-sized future monarchs: HRH Princess Catharina-Amalia of the Netherlands, HRH Princess Ingrid-Alexandra of Norway and HRH Prince Christian of Denmark will be amongst the young attendants on hand to upstage the bride and groom. Royal wedding traditions will be upheld, the bride will look stunning and it is certain to be a memorable occasion for royal watchers.
The ceremony is set to begin at 3:30PM in Stockholm (about 9:30AM in Canada) and I will attempt to simultaneously cover it both on this blog and as a guest writer at The Royal Representative.
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Male Royal Consorts
Prince Albert, Prince Consort
Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh
Currently the longest serving royal consort in history. The husband of
Queen Elizabeth II, he was born in 1921 on a dining room table in Villa Mon Repos on the Greek island of Corfu. He was known as Prince Philip of Greece and Denmark until his engagement to Princess Elizabeth in 1947. He became a naturalized British subject in the same year, giving up his royal titles to become plain Ltn. Philip Mountbatten. Upon his marriage he became HRH Duke of Edinburgh and in 1957 he was given the title Prince of the United Kingdom. In 2007, The Queen and Prince Philip celebrated their Diamond wedding anniversary - the first for any British monarch in history.
Prince Claus of the Netherlands
Prince Henrik of Denmark
Laborde de Monpezat was born in 1934. He married the heir presumptive to the Danish throne, Crown Princess Margarethe, in 1967. Prior to his marriage he was a French diplomat. Raised as a Catholic he converted to Protestantism. At the time of his marriage his name was 'Danicised' to Prince Henrik.
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
The things Prince William and Prince Harry do for England
Think being royal is a glamorous job? Fabulous wealth, jewels, palaces, and minions catering to your every need?
Throw in an 8-ft python and that golden page in the history books doesn't seem so appealing anymore, does it?
Kate, take note.
Throw in an 8-ft python and that golden page in the history books doesn't seem so appealing anymore, does it?
Kate, take note.
Sunday, June 13, 2010
The Royal Report for Sunday June 13th, 2010 has been postponed
Tonight's episode of The Royal Report for Sunday June 13th, 2010 has been postponed
Saturday, June 05, 2010
The Royal Report for Sunday June 6, 2010 - The Blogs Royal
Who are the ubiquitous royal additions to any style icon list? Is Kate Middleton wearing a wedding dress in Star magazine? How has the royal blogsphere changed in the last few years?
Find out on this episode
Publications mentioned
Royal Report
Star Magazine (June 2010) - William & Kate's $40 Million Wedding of the Century
Hello! Canada Weekly No 175 7 June 2010
Hello! Canada - Celebrating 100 years of Style icons
From My Royal Collection
Royalty in Vogue by Josephine Ross
Link to Sarah Ferguson's interview with Oprah Winfrey
Sarah Ferguson Speaks Out about the headline-making undercover video
The Blogs Royal featured on this episode
Royalty with Ella Kay
Princess Palace
Sophia's Royalty
The Royal Universe
Royalty in the News
British Royals
The Cross of Laeken
Lux-arrazzi
Tune in to the next episode of The Royal Report on Sunday June 13, 2010 at 9:00PM EST (North America).
The topic will be: William and Kate Middleton - A Celebration of their love
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Find out on this episode
Publications mentioned
Royal Report
Star Magazine (June 2010) - William & Kate's $40 Million Wedding of the Century
Hello! Canada Weekly No 175 7 June 2010
Hello! Canada - Celebrating 100 years of Style icons
From My Royal Collection
Royalty in Vogue by Josephine Ross
Link to Sarah Ferguson's interview with Oprah Winfrey
Sarah Ferguson Speaks Out about the headline-making undercover video
The Blogs Royal featured on this episode
Royalty with Ella Kay
Princess Palace
Sophia's Royalty
The Royal Universe
Royalty in the News
British Royals
The Cross of Laeken
Lux-arrazzi
Tune in to the next episode of The Royal Report on Sunday June 13, 2010 at 9:00PM EST (North America).
The topic will be: William and Kate Middleton - A Celebration of their love
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Friday, June 04, 2010
Prince William and Kate Middleton's Royal Engagement?
According to a recent blog post by Tina Brown, today was supposed to be the day that William and Kate finally announced their engagement to the world. Right now I'm picturing Prince William kicking back and relaxing while the media goes into overdrive and people like me blog about it. Maybe Prince William is reading the papers and going online, texting Kate to see who can locate the silliest headline first.
As I write this post it is currently 6:47PM in London. I don't know about over there but that's quitting time in North America. The time that people go home to their families and have dinner. However, the day is not over in the UK and there's still time to spare. So we wait until 11:59PM and a last minute reprieve to put us out of our misery.Yes, William's people are just waiting to spring the news on all of us when we least suspect it. Here in Canada it could be cause for a celebration for more reason than one - a Friday, an engagement announcement and warm sunny weather! Boo Yeah!
While we wait, reporters twitter about Tina Brown's credibility. People bought her revelation hook, line-and-sinker and that's when the dissection started: other reporters jealously questioned her sources and thoroughly checked William's and the Queen's diaries for available time to make the announcement. Some wondered if she'd made the prediction to increase traffic to her site. Then there were fears, what if she might actually be *gasp* right! Well, according to one reporter: 'Tina Brown's reputation is riding on her prediction." Today, self-satisfied and commenting: "it was never going to happen today." Like the Duchess of York, is Tina Brown throwing herself at the mercy of friends and 'leaving anguished messages' on their answering machines too?
While it's true that the changes of an engagement announcement on Friday are unlikely, it isn't 12:00AM in the UK just yet.
To quote Prince William, we just have to ''wait and see".
© Marilyn Braun 2010
As I write this post it is currently 6:47PM in London. I don't know about over there but that's quitting time in North America. The time that people go home to their families and have dinner. However, the day is not over in the UK and there's still time to spare. So we wait until 11:59PM and a last minute reprieve to put us out of our misery.Yes, William's people are just waiting to spring the news on all of us when we least suspect it. Here in Canada it could be cause for a celebration for more reason than one - a Friday, an engagement announcement and warm sunny weather! Boo Yeah!
While we wait, reporters twitter about Tina Brown's credibility. People bought her revelation hook, line-and-sinker and that's when the dissection started: other reporters jealously questioned her sources and thoroughly checked William's and the Queen's diaries for available time to make the announcement. Some wondered if she'd made the prediction to increase traffic to her site. Then there were fears, what if she might actually be *gasp* right! Well, according to one reporter: 'Tina Brown's reputation is riding on her prediction." Today, self-satisfied and commenting: "it was never going to happen today." Like the Duchess of York, is Tina Brown throwing herself at the mercy of friends and 'leaving anguished messages' on their answering machines too?
While it's true that the changes of an engagement announcement on Friday are unlikely, it isn't 12:00AM in the UK just yet.
To quote Prince William, we just have to ''wait and see".
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Monday, May 31, 2010
Royal Focus: Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York's wedding dress
When asked about her wedding dress in 1986, Sarah Ferguson said "there will never be a dress to match it." And to date she has been correct.
Her dress was designed by Lindka Cierach and was made from heavy ivory duchess satin, which was manufactured at Britain's only silk farm, Lullingstone near Sherborne in Dorset.The fabric was chosen because, according to Sarah 'it is the creamiest material in the world. It never creases. It is as smooth as glass and hangs beautifully.'
The champagne color of the dress flattered the bride's hair and skin tone. The design had a renaissance silhouette and the fitted, boned bodice had a dropped waist coming into a point at the front and a lower 'V' at the back. The neckline was gently curved and edged with pearls. The sleeves were full, coming into a simple pearl-edged point just below the elbow.
The skirt was flat in front, widening on the sides and full at the back. The 17 1/2 foot train flowed from beneath a fan shaped bow and the underskirt was bordered by a silk scalloped lace flounce billowing out the heavy sheen of the satin skirt. The designer's hallmark - heavy beading - was most strikingly evident on the train and was based on Sarah's Coat-of-Arms. Worked in seed pearls and diamante, the train was embroidered with thistles, bees and hearts and in a nod to Prince Andrew's naval career, anchors, and waves. Rising in a scale at the bottom of the train, a heraldic 'A' led into a double 'S'. The pure silk tulle veil had scalloped edging and was embroidered with true lover's knots and shimmered with sequins. The total number of bugle beads, sequins, crystals pearls and stones on the wedding dress amounted to 155,000.
The satin shoes were designed by Manolo Blahnik and beaded with bees and ribbons in pearls and diamonds. She wore a necklace of cultured pearls intertwined with 18 carat gold and a diamond pearl pendant. She wore a headdress off fresh flowers - roses, lily petals , gardenias (Andrew's favorite flower) and lilies-of-the-valley. At the end of the ceremony the headdress was removed to reveal a diamond tiara, symbolic of her metamorphosis from commoner to royal. As Sarah recalled 'I had stepped up as the country girl; I would walk back as a princess.'
In her hands Sarah carried an "S' shaped spray of cream lilies, palest yellow roses, gardenias, lilies of the valley and the traditional sprig of myrtle.
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Resources
Their Royal Highnesses the Duke & Duchess of York by Christopher Warwick and Valerie Garner
Royal Style Wars : The Trend-Setting Fashion Feud Between the Princess of wales And the Duchess of York
Royalty in Vogue by Josephine Ross
My Story by Sarah, Duchess of York
Invitation To a Royal Wedding ( Sarah Ferguson, Prince Andrew by Trevor Hall
Official Celebration of the Royal Wedding by Gordon Honeycombe
Saturday, May 29, 2010
The Royal Report for Sunday May 30, 2010 - Can Fergie bounce back?
Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York was recently caught in a video sting by an undercover News of the World reporter offering access to Prince Andrew in exchange for money. With a history of mishaps, can she bounce back from this one?
Listen to the episode to find out
Publications mentioned
Hello! Canada Weekly No 174 Spring 2010
Hello! Canada Weekly No 149 9 November 2010
My Story by Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York
News of the World Video mentioned
Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson in cash for access scandal
Blogs and websites mentioned
World of Royalty Website
World of Royalty Blog
Royal News Blog
The Ceremonial Funeral of Lord Louis Mountbatten of Burma
From My Royal Collection
The Royal Way of Death (History & Politics) by Olivia Bland
Tune in LIVE to the next episode of The Royal Report on Sunday June 6, 2010 at 9:00PM EST (North America).
The topic to be determined
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Listen to the episode to find out
Publications mentioned
Hello! Canada Weekly No 174 Spring 2010
Hello! Canada Weekly No 149 9 November 2010
My Story by Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York
News of the World Video mentioned
Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson in cash for access scandal
Blogs and websites mentioned
World of Royalty Website
World of Royalty Blog
Royal News Blog
The Ceremonial Funeral of Lord Louis Mountbatten of Burma
From My Royal Collection
The Royal Way of Death (History & Politics) by Olivia Bland
Tune in LIVE to the next episode of The Royal Report on Sunday June 6, 2010 at 9:00PM EST (North America).
The topic to be determined
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Why Prince Andrew should forgive Fergie
Prince Andrew must, no doubt, be aware of the story of his ex-wife having been caught in a sting by a journalist from the News of the World. We can only imagine the 'apoleptic rage' he keeps hidden behind the royal reserve while attending engagements. To his credit he ignored questions by reporters, thereby not engaging in a public mud slinging match. One well chosen syllable of which would have been enough to destroy her reputation for good.
Fergie, who was in the US to accept an award will be returning to the UK soon. The Daily Mail predicts there will be a showdown, where she will be called to account to her ex-husband for her latest gaffe. Fergie, in her 'fragile mental state,', according to the Express, is 'throwing herself at the mercy of friends.' "Desperate and in a bad place' she has taken to leaving 'anguished messages' on a friend's answering machine. Oh the melodrama!
Prince Andrew of all people must be aware of the predicament Fergie is in. After all, didn't his family help place her there by shafting her in the divorce settlement? Leaving her with little more than £15,000 and the remnants of a royal title. Who can blame her for trading off on what she has? Isn't he doing the same? Were it not for his title, would he be in the same position he is now?
The Prince is also well aware of how the media has treated members of his family. This is not the first run in with News of the World, and it probably won't be the last. Hopefully the Duchess will be wiser the next time but given her track record I doubt it. Placing the blame solely on Fergie and permanently faulting her for being naive would make them both look bad.
Let's also not forget that she is the mother of his children. The princesses must be caught in the middle, their loyalties divided. Beatrice and Eugenie must know their mother and the position she's in better than most, yet at the same time realizing that a price shouldn't be put on their royal heritage. I've always gotten the impression that Andrew and Sarah, sharing living arrangements and holidays, as the 'happiest divorced couple in the world' who, in Andrew's words, are 'divorced to each other, but not from each other' must share a special bond that the rest of us find hard to comprehend. A bond which survives even through her previous gaffes, some which have been more humiliating to him than being offered up for £500,000.
My money is on them weathering this storm too. After all of these years and after all they have been through, they must be fairly familiar with the following quote: 'to err is human, to forgive is divine.'
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Fergie, who was in the US to accept an award will be returning to the UK soon. The Daily Mail predicts there will be a showdown, where she will be called to account to her ex-husband for her latest gaffe. Fergie, in her 'fragile mental state,', according to the Express, is 'throwing herself at the mercy of friends.' "Desperate and in a bad place' she has taken to leaving 'anguished messages' on a friend's answering machine. Oh the melodrama!
Prince Andrew of all people must be aware of the predicament Fergie is in. After all, didn't his family help place her there by shafting her in the divorce settlement? Leaving her with little more than £15,000 and the remnants of a royal title. Who can blame her for trading off on what she has? Isn't he doing the same? Were it not for his title, would he be in the same position he is now?
The Prince is also well aware of how the media has treated members of his family. This is not the first run in with News of the World, and it probably won't be the last. Hopefully the Duchess will be wiser the next time but given her track record I doubt it. Placing the blame solely on Fergie and permanently faulting her for being naive would make them both look bad.
Let's also not forget that she is the mother of his children. The princesses must be caught in the middle, their loyalties divided. Beatrice and Eugenie must know their mother and the position she's in better than most, yet at the same time realizing that a price shouldn't be put on their royal heritage. I've always gotten the impression that Andrew and Sarah, sharing living arrangements and holidays, as the 'happiest divorced couple in the world' who, in Andrew's words, are 'divorced to each other, but not from each other' must share a special bond that the rest of us find hard to comprehend. A bond which survives even through her previous gaffes, some which have been more humiliating to him than being offered up for £500,000.
My money is on them weathering this storm too. After all of these years and after all they have been through, they must be fairly familiar with the following quote: 'to err is human, to forgive is divine.'
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Sunday, May 23, 2010
Can Fergie bounce back?
Fergie.
Fergie, Fergie, Fergie (insert dramatic sigh here).
What have you done this time? Just when we thought you were on the road to royal redemption, breaking scones with the royal family at tea time and cozily living with your ex-husband as, what you call yourselves: "the happiest divorced couple in the world." You get caught in a video sting by an undercover reporter for News of the World. I hate when that happens.
My first reaction to your video? Holy c**p!
Second reaction to your video? She's done it again!
How, I wondered, could you still be so naive after all of these years?
Yes, you were shafted by the royal family in the divorce settlement. Yes, you have had to make your own way in the world. Having a title didn't hurt you. But your royal connections seemed to be off limits. Watching this video they obviously are not. Yet you are not the first person connected to the royal family to be captured making unflattered revealtions - Sophie, Countess of Wessex and Princess Michael of Kent to name but two. If anything, you're in good company.
You have apologized for your "serious lapse in judgement." As the royals supposedly react to these things, the Queen herself must be 'incandescent with rage', Charles must be 'knashing his teeth' and the scandal is said to have shaken the royals. Then there are the rest of us who may be bemused, shocked, or indifferent. It is incredibly unfortunate, especially for some of us who had held out hope that when the Queen goes to that great palace in the sky, that you two might once again be reunited on commmemorative china. Like waiting for William and Kate to get married, we all have unrealistic dreams.
Reports of your financial difficulties are nothing new. You have denied them in the past but there is no denying it now. It must be a desperate situation for you to offer up the Duke of York to the higest bidder. While the deal you were trying to broker is shocking, it is your naivety that is painful to watch. Your appearance in the video, smoking, looking stressed and hunched over was pathetic for a woman circa 1986 who joined the royal family with such 'breath of fresh air' potential.
It's hard to say how this will affect your future with your business and your credibilty. I feel sad that for all of the progress you have made with the royal family you might be back to square one. Not to mention how your daughters must feel being caught in the middle. But you have bounced back before and you have proven that you are a survivor when others have chosen to count you out. And in that respect I'm not worried about you - for now.
This too shall pass...until the next time...
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Fergie, Fergie, Fergie (insert dramatic sigh here).
What have you done this time? Just when we thought you were on the road to royal redemption, breaking scones with the royal family at tea time and cozily living with your ex-husband as, what you call yourselves: "the happiest divorced couple in the world." You get caught in a video sting by an undercover reporter for News of the World. I hate when that happens.
My first reaction to your video? Holy c**p!
Second reaction to your video? She's done it again!
How, I wondered, could you still be so naive after all of these years?
Yes, you were shafted by the royal family in the divorce settlement. Yes, you have had to make your own way in the world. Having a title didn't hurt you. But your royal connections seemed to be off limits. Watching this video they obviously are not. Yet you are not the first person connected to the royal family to be captured making unflattered revealtions - Sophie, Countess of Wessex and Princess Michael of Kent to name but two. If anything, you're in good company.
You have apologized for your "serious lapse in judgement." As the royals supposedly react to these things, the Queen herself must be 'incandescent with rage', Charles must be 'knashing his teeth' and the scandal is said to have shaken the royals. Then there are the rest of us who may be bemused, shocked, or indifferent. It is incredibly unfortunate, especially for some of us who had held out hope that when the Queen goes to that great palace in the sky, that you two might once again be reunited on commmemorative china. Like waiting for William and Kate to get married, we all have unrealistic dreams.
Reports of your financial difficulties are nothing new. You have denied them in the past but there is no denying it now. It must be a desperate situation for you to offer up the Duke of York to the higest bidder. While the deal you were trying to broker is shocking, it is your naivety that is painful to watch. Your appearance in the video, smoking, looking stressed and hunched over was pathetic for a woman circa 1986 who joined the royal family with such 'breath of fresh air' potential.
It's hard to say how this will affect your future with your business and your credibilty. I feel sad that for all of the progress you have made with the royal family you might be back to square one. Not to mention how your daughters must feel being caught in the middle. But you have bounced back before and you have proven that you are a survivor when others have chosen to count you out. And in that respect I'm not worried about you - for now.
This too shall pass...until the next time...
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Saturday, May 15, 2010
The Royal Report for Sunday May 16, 2010 - A Celebration of Prince Harry and Chelsy Davy's love
On this episode I "celebrate" the love of Prince Harry and Chelsy Davy.
You can listen to my celebration here
Publications mentioned
Hello! Canada Weekly No 173 17 May 2010
PEOPLE: THE ROYALS - THEIR LIVES, LOVES AND SECRETS - 2010 version
People - The Royals, Their Lives, Loves and Secrets 2006 version
Blogs mentioned
The Royal Representative
From my Royal Collection
Happy and Glorious: Six Reigns of Royal Photography
There will be no show next week due to the Victoria Day weekend. Tune in LIVE to the next episode of The Royal Report on Sunday May 30, 2010 9:00PM EST (North America)
The topic to be determined
© Marilyn Braun 2010
You can listen to my celebration here
Publications mentioned
Hello! Canada Weekly No 173 17 May 2010
PEOPLE: THE ROYALS - THEIR LIVES, LOVES AND SECRETS - 2010 version
People - The Royals, Their Lives, Loves and Secrets 2006 version
Blogs mentioned
The Royal Representative
From my Royal Collection
Happy and Glorious: Six Reigns of Royal Photography
There will be no show next week due to the Victoria Day weekend. Tune in LIVE to the next episode of The Royal Report on Sunday May 30, 2010 9:00PM EST (North America)
The topic to be determined
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Contact Form
Featured Post
If being royal is so extraordinary, why do the royals want to be ordinary?
Being royal is clearly not all it is cracked up to be. Gilt here and there. Liveried footmen abound. Church bells ring on your birthday. Red...
Search This Blog
Popular Posts
-
Definition: A queen regnant is a female ruler who reigns in her own right. Unlike a queen consort who is the spouse of the reigning king, wi...
-
An occupational hazard of marrying into the royal family is receiving thousands of bouquets throughout your royal career. While these flower...
-
Since the reign of King George IV, most sovereigns have created a form of royal family order for members of the royal family, usually female...
-
When my daughter was born in November 2004, within minutes of her birth, the first question the nurses asked was "What's her name?...
-
Royalty have their image on stamps and commemorative items. Some more notable royals have buildings, docks, and streets that bear their name...
-
She was born on April 25, 1897 in Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee year. Queen Victoria called her "My dear little Jubilee baby...
-
Best known as the mother of Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York, she was part of a family that can trace their ancestry back to 1557. Born on ...
-
I'm mad. I don't remember the last time I was this disappointed. I've just found out that Camilla is not attending the Diana M...
