At least according to Star magazine she is. Yet people have come out of the woodwork, emphatically denying these reports. I, for one am thoroughly disappointed.
Mainly because it would have made the royal family far more interesting. Injected some much needed controversy. Forget the two or three days of Fergie-gate 2010, an illegitimate child would have enough mileage for the next nine months. We could blog about her motivations for getting pregnant, whether the baby is actually William's, fire up discussion boards discussing whether he will make an honest woman of her, how this will affect the line of succession, and all of the royals and courtiers who are 'incandescent with rage' and 'knashing their teeth'.
Illegitimate children are nothing new to the royal family. History is littered with them. However, in the last 100 years we've had advancements in birth control, and the rabid media interest as back-up protection. If they wanted to take the heat off of an engagement announcement, this would have been the perfect way to do it aside from breaking-up or converting to Catholicism.
Did I mention that I'm extremely disappointed?
I am wistful thinking of the possibilities. Yes, once everyone got over the initial shock of it all, we would follow the pregnancy minutely. How she would cope as a single-mother should William drop the ball, what she would be wearing, where she would have the baby, boy or girl, names, titles, official photos, genealogists would pour over the history of royal bastards. Not to mention all of the show topics it would inspire. An example - On the next Royal Report: Now that Kate is knocked-up, will she go for natural or c-section?
Alas, it looks like I'll have to wait until they're married to speculate on all of this. How boring is that? It just won't be the same. Royal history is littered with legitimate children. Case in point: aside from the Queen, what have any of them ever done? William and Kate's illegitimate baby could live under the spectre of it for the rest of his/her life because we'd be here to remind them, the psychological difficulties of living under the burden of it all, if William doesn't marry Kate, how he/she will feel about being robbed of their birthright....
*Sigh*
© Marilyn Braun 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Contact Form
Featured Post
If being royal is so extraordinary, why do the royals want to be ordinary?
Being royal is clearly not all it is cracked up to be. Gilt here and there. Liveried footmen abound. Church bells ring on your birthday. Red...
Search This Blog
Popular Posts
-
The final arrival in the royal marriage race that began with the death of Princess Charlotte in 1817, she was a first cousin of Queen Victor...
-
Best known as the mother of Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York, she was part of a family that can trace their ancestry back to 1557. Born on ...
-
I've always wanted to create a royal forum, but I was never quite certain how to go about it until now. So here it is: Marilyn's Roy...
-
When Princess Charlotte is christened on Sunday July 5th, she will traditionally be given five or six godparents/sponsors. Prince William ha...
-
Invariably labeled 'slow', 'backward' and a 'lunatic', his memory is destined to be clouded by mystery. Considered u...
-
It seems every few days brings another breathless headline: Prince Harry still estranged from his father and brother! As if we’re all waiti...
-
Embed from Getty Images As mentioned in a previous post, Diana elevated diplomatic dressing to an art form. This dress is another excelle...
-
Scott Scott has asked: Whats the difference between a 'House' and a Dynasty? What is The Queen's House, Dynasty and surname? Tha...
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(101)
-
▼
June
(15)
- Not a monarchist, just semi-fascinated at the moment
- The Royal Tour of Canada 2010 - Day Two
- The Royal Tour of Canada 2010 - Day One
- The Royal Report for Sunday June 27, 2010 - Prince...
- Swedish Royal Wedding Report
- Prince William and Prince Harry vs the vuvuzelas
- The Royal Report for Sunday June 20th, 2010 - A Ce...
- Unfortunately Kate Middleton isn't pregnant
- Swedish Royal Wedding fever
- Prince William supports the Republican movement
- Male Royal Consorts
- The things Prince William and Prince Harry do for ...
- The Royal Report for Sunday June 13th, 2010 has be...
- The Royal Report for Sunday June 6, 2010 - The Blo...
- Prince William and Kate Middleton's Royal Engagement?
-
▼
June
(15)
No comments:
Post a Comment