Embed from Getty Images
Two years ago, I watched in awe as Prince Harry finally got his happily ever after. Looking at Meghan's ecstatic face, bouncing with joy, as she joined Harry at the altar, you would never have suspected the family controversy only days before. The only evidence was Meghan walking alone, part way, up the aisle. Creating one of the most compelling royal wedding images ever.
Embed from Getty Images
Today was indeed special. Harry had spent the last 7 years playing third wheel to William and Catherine at joint engagements. Now he would finally have a happy family of his own. There were signs this ceremony would be different, it was more personal and less formal. Judging by the reaction shots of the royals during the ceremony, they seemed uncertain how to respond to Bishop Michael Curry's energetic sermon. I doubt St George's Chapel had ever hosted an American gospel choir within its 500 year history. It was an unforgettable and unique day.
At the time. William, Catherine, Harry and Meghan, were lauded as the 'Fab Four'. Two years on, the royal family looks very different. It is hard to celebrate when the two couples held such promise for the future. Each generation plays a role in reinvigorating an institution viewed by many as outdated in democratic society. Queen Victoria was 18 when she inherited the throne, a fresh start after reigns of dissolute kings. King George VI, Queen Elizabeth and their young family, offered stability after the abdication crisis. Their daughter, Princess Elizabeth, now Queen Elizabeth II, heralded a new future when she made her 21st birthday speech in South Africa in 1947.
Each heir has a path, a predetermined future, providing continuity people expect. But there are consequences when you step out of your lane or ignore it altogether. Prince Edward, later King Edward VIII and Duke of Windsor, was a counterpoint to his stuffy parents. He brought the worst controversy in modern royal history. Princess Margaret had a scandalous relationship with Peter Townsend. Charles, Diana, Andrew and Sarah Ferguson brought their own troubles. Diana's death struck a different blow. For all of the doom and gloom predictions, the royal family survived, as they always do. But it is somewhat ironic that Camilla, the source of so much anguish in Charles and Diana's marriage, should be the one to help steady the ship.
William and Catherine are now caretakers of the future. Harry and Meghan tried to mould a different future and paid a high price in trying. Despite good intentions, maybe they never had a chance to begin with. Regardless of what happens in the future, the royal institution will continue, as it always does.
Today is Harry and Meghan's second wedding anniversary. A day to celebrate their happiness and joy. It is also a reminder of a promising future and what might have been.
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Tuesday, May 19, 2020
Monday, May 18, 2020
Whatever happened to Princess Diana's Catherine Walker cream and salmon pink long dinner dress?
Embed from Getty Images
Of the 79 dresses, this is, hands down, my absolute favourite. It is timeless, classic and if anyone could have worn it better, I haven't seen a photo. Nope, don't even show me one. I will die on that hill, trust me. Sure, the word salmon doesn't sound attractive, but just look at photos of Diana. If anyone can make salmon look good, it is her.
Aside from my interest in it, this dress is hard to single out. Yes, it has large shoulder pads from the 1980s, but I don't think this negatively impacts the appearance. It also doesn't have elaborate beading, or a feature that would make it stand out from the rest of the auctioned gowns. It isn't associated with a famous figure, like the Elvis or Travolta dresses. As far as I can tell, it wasn't worn during an official tour.
Instead, it worn at a Royal Charity Performance of Swan Lake at the London Coliseum in November 1989. The gala was in support of the rare Russian Bewick swans that migrate to Great Britain during the winter. A year later at a tribute to Dame Margo Fonteyn. In 1992 for an Australian ballet performance Coppélia at the London Coliseum, and in July 1993 for a London engagement. Like many of Diana's other dresses, it has also appeared on a Franklin Mint commemorative doll.
This dress was chosen from a collection and original had a plunging neckline, which Diana thought was too daring. An insert was added in front but it plunges in the back, so I guess you could say both Diana and the dress designer got their way.
Embed from Getty Images
It is described in the auction catalogue as: A long dinner dress of cream and salmon pink silk.
It was Lot #71 at the Christie's auction and purchased for $25,300 by Sheri and Bill Graham from Salisbury, North Carolina.It has been displayed at the Appleton Museum in Florida, charity functions and for educational purposes, such as middle school projects. It has also been included as part of "Diana: Legacy of a Princess" exhibit on the Queen Mary ship.
As of 2017, they still owns the dress along with another Catherine Walker purchased during the auction. They have declined offers to sell them. However, if they ever do for this one, I'll be happy to consider it.
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Sources
Princess Diana captivates the world 20 years after her death
The exclusive Diana dress exhibit opens Sunday
Catherine Walker - An autobiography by The Private Couturier to Diana, Princess of Wales.
Christies: Dresses from the Collection of Diana, Princess of Wales auction catalogue
Of the 79 dresses, this is, hands down, my absolute favourite. It is timeless, classic and if anyone could have worn it better, I haven't seen a photo. Nope, don't even show me one. I will die on that hill, trust me. Sure, the word salmon doesn't sound attractive, but just look at photos of Diana. If anyone can make salmon look good, it is her.
Aside from my interest in it, this dress is hard to single out. Yes, it has large shoulder pads from the 1980s, but I don't think this negatively impacts the appearance. It also doesn't have elaborate beading, or a feature that would make it stand out from the rest of the auctioned gowns. It isn't associated with a famous figure, like the Elvis or Travolta dresses. As far as I can tell, it wasn't worn during an official tour.
Instead, it worn at a Royal Charity Performance of Swan Lake at the London Coliseum in November 1989. The gala was in support of the rare Russian Bewick swans that migrate to Great Britain during the winter. A year later at a tribute to Dame Margo Fonteyn. In 1992 for an Australian ballet performance Coppélia at the London Coliseum, and in July 1993 for a London engagement. Like many of Diana's other dresses, it has also appeared on a Franklin Mint commemorative doll.
This dress was chosen from a collection and original had a plunging neckline, which Diana thought was too daring. An insert was added in front but it plunges in the back, so I guess you could say both Diana and the dress designer got their way.
Embed from Getty Images
It is described in the auction catalogue as: A long dinner dress of cream and salmon pink silk.
The dress has long sleeves and the bodice is of cream silk, cut to reveal an under bodice. The skirt, of salmon pink silk is slit at the back and the cuff to the sleeves are set with large gilt cufflinks, set with Baroque pearls.
It was Lot #71 at the Christie's auction and purchased for $25,300 by Sheri and Bill Graham from Salisbury, North Carolina.It has been displayed at the Appleton Museum in Florida, charity functions and for educational purposes, such as middle school projects. It has also been included as part of "Diana: Legacy of a Princess" exhibit on the Queen Mary ship.
As of 2017, they still owns the dress along with another Catherine Walker purchased during the auction. They have declined offers to sell them. However, if they ever do for this one, I'll be happy to consider it.
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Sources
Princess Diana captivates the world 20 years after her death
The exclusive Diana dress exhibit opens Sunday
Catherine Walker - An autobiography by The Private Couturier to Diana, Princess of Wales.
Christies: Dresses from the Collection of Diana, Princess of Wales auction catalogue
Friday, May 15, 2020
What happened to Princess Diana's Pink Silk Mughal dress by Catherine Walker
Embed from Getty Images
As mentioned in a previous post, Diana elevated diplomatic dressing to an art form. This dress is another excellent example. It was designed by Catherine Walker a favoured couturier who dressed Diana from 1982 until her death in 1997.
Lot #19 in the Christie's auction, it is described in the catalogue as 'A long Evening Dress of Pink Wild Silk, with an embroidered red bolero'.
It is further described:
The strapless bodice is embroidered overall with pink and white flowers, some couched, with green sequins, star-shaped sequins, gold glass beads and gold braid, echoing Mughal embroidery motifs. The long sleeved bolero jacket, has a bodice embroidered overall en suite with the dress. The cuffs each have three, fine buttons of pink and green paste. The dress was made for the Princess' India tour in 1992.
Embed from Getty Images
Inspiration for the embroidery came from the lid of an Indian inlaid marquetry box found in a London market. The thread and needlework were chosen to reflect the country she was visiting and the embroidery was completed by S. Lock Ltd.
The 1992 India visit was Charles and Diana's second to last tour together before they separated in December of the same year. It led to some memorable images: the photo of Diana alone at the Taj Mahal, and another of her turning her head as Charles tried to kiss her. She wore several fantastic outfits in India but considering the amount of beautiful and intricate detail in this dress, I can't locate a single photo of Diana wearing it during the tour. The only photo of Diana in the dress was taken for the 1997 auction catalogue by Lord Snowdon.
It was bought by Maureen Dunkle Rorech, for $61,900. She purchased 14 gowns, including the Travolta dress but this one was her personal favourite. It went around the world in the Dresses for Humanity tour. I originally saw the exhibit in 1998 when it came to Toronto, but the dresses toured various locations, including Disney World, Pittsburgh Home and Garden Show, and the Flying Monkey movie house in New Hampshire. However, the tour ran into trouble with creditors and in 2010, this dress was confiscated for five months until the debt was paid.
This dress, along with 9 others originally purchased by Ms. Rorech, was auctioned in 2013 by Kerry Taylor Auctions. It was bought for £66,000 ($82,000 USD) by William Doyle, CEO of Newbridge Silverware Museum in Kildaire, Ireland. It is currently on display in their Museum of Style Icons exhibit.
 |
| Photo © Kenneth Allen (cc-by-sa/2.0) |
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Sources
Princess Diana in India: A look back at her iconic visit
Princess Diana's Mughal dress to go under the Hammer
Diana Auction 1997
Princess Diana’s dresses fetch £800,000 at Kerry Taylor Auctions
The Diana Dresses
Shamed Florida socialite is forced to sell Diana's iconic dresses to pay off debts: But will Prince William buy them back?
Wednesday, May 13, 2020
Whatever happened to Princess Diana's Yuki Torimaru dress?
Embed from Getty Images
A favourite custom of members of the royal family is to pay tribute to the country you are visiting by wearing a designer and/or colour associated with that country. For instance, in Canada every royal lady, at some point, shows up in red and white, sometimes accessorized with a maple leaf during an official visit. It's almost a cliche.
Diana was no different. While she did try to fly the flag for British fashion when she was at home, on official tours she elevated diplomatic dressing to an art form, paying tribute in a variety of ways: white dress with red polka dots in Japan, evening dress with embroidered falcons for Saudi Arabia, Chanel for a trip to Paris, Moghul inspired beading for India, and so on. This dress is also an excellent example of it.
It was Lot 68 at the Christie's auction and it is described in the catalogue as 'A Long, Pleated Fortuny-Style Formal Dinner Dress in Royal Blue by Yuki.'
Inspired by the work of Fortuny and Erte, the dress is embroidered at the neck with a yoke of blue bugle beads, which are echoed at the waist with a diamond motif of the same beads.While Yuki is a popular designer in Japan, at the time he was little known outside of it. When Diana needed a dress for a 1986 trip to Japan to attend the enthronement of Emperor Hirohito, Yuki was recommended to her and he was asked to submit sketches not long before she was scheduled to leave. Yuki had already prepared dresses with measurements he was able to get from another designer, and when he met with her he brought completed versions in red, blue and white. She chose the blue one. It was a detour from what she normally wore.
Embed from Getty Images
His pride began to evaporate as the tour continued without her wearing his dress. During the highlight of the visit, a banquet with the Emperor, Diana wore Yuki's uncrushable royal-blue dress. Thus raising his profile in both countries. The dress would later be worn during a visit to the English National Ballet in 1990.
There is a copy of the dress in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, which has an extensive Yuki collection. The original was bought for $25,300 by James Kojima on behalf of his cousin, Akihito Kojima, Principal of Mejiro Fashion & Art College. In fact, they purchased three gowns. These gowns are carefully stored and brought out each year for the first day of school and special occasions. The college is very selective about who they lend their dresses to but recently they appeared at Kensington Palace for their "Diana: Her Fashion Story exhibit".
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Sources
The Lady and the Rose - Diana: Her Fashion Story
Gnyuki Torimaru (Yuki) Style Patterns
Designer for a Princess: Yuki Torimaru
Museum of Fine Arts Boston - Copy of dress worn by Diana Spencer Princess of Wales in 1986
Desired Dresses
Designer Yuki Fortuny Pleats with Bugle Bead Panel Gown 1986 Japan
Diana - Her Life in Fashion by Georgina Howell
Christie's catalogue: Dresses from the Collection of Diana, Princess of Wales
Monday, May 11, 2020
Whatever happened to Princess Diana's Diagheliv inspired dress?
Embed from Getty Images
Searching for David and Elizabeth Emanuel, you will find most media coverage includes Diana, Princess of Wales. Attempt to find information about the Emanuel's Diaghilev collection, and it will only find a cursory mention in relation to this dress. That's both a curse and a blessing. You will always have a place in the history books but searches will revolve around Diana and not what you have done before or since. It is understandable. Let's face it, they designed some of the most significant items Diana has ever worn, including the white chiffon blouse she wore for a Vogue photoshoot and the famous strapless black dress for her first engagement. Oh, and also the wedding dress of the century!
Embed from Getty Images
Although striking, this dress is not nearly as iconic. It has a unique, costume-like quality, which is appropriate as it was inspired by Leon Bakst's designs for Diaghilev ballet Russes. It was one of twelve dresses from the Emmanuel's Diaghilev collection. Diana first saw it at a Red Cross benefit fashion show in the summer of 1986. Many designers have commented that Diana had the perfect figure. So perfect that Diana chose the size 10 dress from the mannequin instead of ordering her own version. It came with a matching padded headband with gold ribbon and pearls, lozenge shaped sleeve panels and petticoat. Diana wore the dress with and without these accessories and wore a tiara instead of the headband on occasion. She wore it in public about three times: for a performance of Ivan the Terrible at the Royal Opera House, a James Bond premiere and a banquet at the German Embassy in London.
Embed from Getty Images
It was lot #26 at the Christie's 1997 auction, purchased for $25,300 by Fontaine Minor, a socialite from Richmond, Virginia. She was interviewed for the documentary Diana's Dresses. Clearly proud and protective of it, the dress is propped up in a chair behind her. Beside the dress is an expressionless security guard, no doubt reconsidering his life choices.
Like most of Diana's dresses, it has not been kept in a closet. It has appeared at many charity events, to raise money for Richmond- area organizations such as the Richmond Ballet and Symphony Orchestra, a mother/daughter tea at Jefferson's Hotel Grand Ballroom, modelled by Ms. Minor's daughter and granddaughters, and put on exhibit at Kensington Palace. It was auctioned in December 2013 for $167,433, with proceeds split between charities favoured by Diana and Ms. Minor and her family.
The buyer is listed as an unidentified 'overseas museum'. As this could mean anywhere from Antarctica to Tuvalu, the search continues. It has been 7 years since the auction so I'm hoping they will reveal their name and put the dress on display for people to enjoy for many years to come.
Update: In 2017 it was included in a Remembering Diana exhibit at the Museo de la Moda in Chile.
Embed from Getty Images
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Sources
Richmonder putting Di's dress up for auction in England
Diana's dress sells for £120K
The "Gold Diagheliv" Gown is auctioned in London
Auction brings seven-fold bounty for Diana dress
A Princess Tea Party
Princess Diana's favourite fairytale dress could be yours...for a price
Going, Going, Gone! Di's Defrocked
The Creation of a Designer House
Diana's Dresses - Documentary
New owners of Diana's dresses come to Christie's to collect their gowns
Being There: An Affair to Remember
The Frocks that Became a Princess
Friday, May 08, 2020
Whatever happened to Princess Diana's Murray Arbeid Blue Silk Tulle dance dress?
Embed from Getty Images
I've always thought this looked like an 80's prom dress. With the diamante stars and excessive layers of tulle, it has a 'what was I thinking when I wore it?' vibe. Fast forward 34 years and, as far as I'm concerned, the verdict is still out.
Diana must have liked the dress, because she wore it on several occasions. It was made for a private dinner given by former King Constantine of Hellenes at Claridges in 1986. She also wore it with shocking pink gloves to the premiere of Phantom of the Opera, The Royal Opera House in Covent Garden and in Paris in 1988. She even modelled it for the Christie's auction catalogue.
Embed from Getty Images
It is described as 'A Ballerina-Length strapless Dance Dress.' According to the auction catalogue:
The dress was lot 28 at the Christie's auction in 1997 and sold for $48,300 to Memphis philanthropist and fashion designer, Pat Kerr Tigrett. She bought four dresses at the auction, paying $133,000, but the tulle one was the most expensive. She has a significant collection of royal memorabilia and textiles, dating back to the 17th century, including items belonging to Queen Victoria and the Duchess of Windsor.
However, shortly after she purchased the tulle dress she found another version, advertised as the original in The Mint Museum in Charlotte, North Carolina. That dress was owned by Gene London and John Thomas, New York dealers in theatrical costumes who claimed the dress was sold to them by the original Christies buyer.
Although Ms. Tigrett, purchased the dress from Christies, the actual design was not unique, or exclusive to Diana. In fact, Murray Arbeid, who died in 2011, made several. According to the designer, in an interview for a documentary about the auctioned dresses:
After Diana's death, Ms. Tigrett kept the four dresses out of the spotlight to avoid the macabre frenzy that followed. In 2002 she allowed her four gowns to be included in an exhibit at the Tennessee State Museum. Two of her Diana dresses were included in the Kensington Palace exhibit Diana: Her Fashion Story.
As of 2020, she still owns her dresses. In 2013 she lent the Arbeid, for three years, to Kensington Palace for their Fashion Rules exhibit. It was the first time it had been exhibited in the UK. Afterwards, it made a newsworthy return to Memphis on what would have been Diana's 55th birthday.
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Was museum duped by copy of dress?
Commercial Reader: Fashions
The Princess's old clothes definitely duds
Books, Birkins and Beauty: Fashion Rules at Kensington Palace - Part III
Murray Arbeid has a few words about Diana, Fergie, Moms of the bride and happy hour chic
Whatever happened to Princess Diana's dresses?
DRESSES from the Collection of Diana, Princess of Wales, Christie's auction catalogue
Diana, Woman of Style by Jackie Modlinger
Diana - Her Life in Fashion by Georgina Howell
I've always thought this looked like an 80's prom dress. With the diamante stars and excessive layers of tulle, it has a 'what was I thinking when I wore it?' vibe. Fast forward 34 years and, as far as I'm concerned, the verdict is still out.
Diana must have liked the dress, because she wore it on several occasions. It was made for a private dinner given by former King Constantine of Hellenes at Claridges in 1986. She also wore it with shocking pink gloves to the premiere of Phantom of the Opera, The Royal Opera House in Covent Garden and in Paris in 1988. She even modelled it for the Christie's auction catalogue.
Embed from Getty Images
It is described as 'A Ballerina-Length strapless Dance Dress.' According to the auction catalogue:
Of midnight blue silk tulle, the dress has a dropped waistline, the bodice is dropped with vertical pleats and embroidered with diamante brilliants placed at random. The top layer of the tulle skirt is embroidered with diamante stars. The skirt comprises four layers of tulle, with a deep purple silk petticoat, the bodice is also lined with deep purple silk to create a shimmering effect.Embed from Getty Images
The dress was lot 28 at the Christie's auction in 1997 and sold for $48,300 to Memphis philanthropist and fashion designer, Pat Kerr Tigrett. She bought four dresses at the auction, paying $133,000, but the tulle one was the most expensive. She has a significant collection of royal memorabilia and textiles, dating back to the 17th century, including items belonging to Queen Victoria and the Duchess of Windsor.
However, shortly after she purchased the tulle dress she found another version, advertised as the original in The Mint Museum in Charlotte, North Carolina. That dress was owned by Gene London and John Thomas, New York dealers in theatrical costumes who claimed the dress was sold to them by the original Christies buyer.
Although Ms. Tigrett, purchased the dress from Christies, the actual design was not unique, or exclusive to Diana. In fact, Murray Arbeid, who died in 2011, made several. According to the designer, in an interview for a documentary about the auctioned dresses:
"That dress was a very, very successful dress in the collection and there is certainly more than one of them. I would like to say, many more, there are possibly 15, 20 of them still floating around. It was a very good evening dress and after all, the Princess never said, 'this has got to be the only one, you mustn't make it for anybody else'. Simple as that."
After Diana's death, Ms. Tigrett kept the four dresses out of the spotlight to avoid the macabre frenzy that followed. In 2002 she allowed her four gowns to be included in an exhibit at the Tennessee State Museum. Two of her Diana dresses were included in the Kensington Palace exhibit Diana: Her Fashion Story.
As of 2020, she still owns her dresses. In 2013 she lent the Arbeid, for three years, to Kensington Palace for their Fashion Rules exhibit. It was the first time it had been exhibited in the UK. Afterwards, it made a newsworthy return to Memphis on what would have been Diana's 55th birthday.
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Was museum duped by copy of dress?
Commercial Reader: Fashions
The Princess's old clothes definitely duds
Books, Birkins and Beauty: Fashion Rules at Kensington Palace - Part III
Murray Arbeid has a few words about Diana, Fergie, Moms of the bride and happy hour chic
Whatever happened to Princess Diana's dresses?
DRESSES from the Collection of Diana, Princess of Wales, Christie's auction catalogue
Diana, Woman of Style by Jackie Modlinger
Diana - Her Life in Fashion by Georgina Howell
Wednesday, May 06, 2020
Whatever happened to Diana's Christina Stambolian's 'Revenge Dress'?
Embed from Getty Images
In my quest to track down Diana's auctioned dresses to the current owners, I've started running into details I did not consider. Such is the case with this dress.
The Christina Stambolian isn't just any dress. It is famous as Diana's 'Revenge Dress.' She famously wore it in June 1994, on the night her husband confessed adultery on television. What should have been his moment to set a record straight, became the perfect moment for Diana to shine.
When the dress was designed, it was a one-and-only, special, made-to-measure for Diana. She had purchased it late summer 1991, but it would be three years before she wore it on that fateful night. At the time she was against black. Because the dress was so daring, she considered having it made in ivory, but she thought it would be too virginal. The short black, silk jacquard, off-the-shoulder dress with vee bodice falling onto a chiffon skirt, was made with Italian fabrics from Como. Paired with black tights, high heels and her famous sapphire, diamond and pearl choker, the dress was a showstopper.
The original dress was lot #2 at the 1997 Christie's auction. It was sold to Graeme and Briege Mackenzie of Gourock Scotland, for $74,000. The couple have used the dress to raise funds for Scottish charities. On Christina Stambolian's website, she confirms he purchased it. One article mentions he keeps the dress in a bank vault and brings it out as a big draw for major Scottish charity fundraisers. But he bought the dress over 20 years ago. Does he still own it? If not, where did it go from there?
I was excited when I tracked it down to the Museum of Style Icons and Newbridge Silver Museum in Kildaire, Ireland where it is on permanent exhibit. Or did I? As mentioned in previous posts, several of Diana's dresses have been auctioned multiple times, frequently by Kerry Taylor. The Revenge Dress is clearly labelled a 'replica,' in the March 17, 2011 Kerry Taylor auction catalogue. William Doyle, CEO of the museum, acquired the dress on display around the same time.
Embed from Getty Images
What is known, in 2010 Christina Stambolian created an exact replica of the revenge dress using the same material and Diana's measurements. Given the dress is identical, the Diana connection is there, whether she wore it or not. The replica comes with a letter of authenticity from the designer that this version and the one worn by Diana, are the only two in existence and she has no intention of producing more.
I have found little media coverage of Graeme's MacKenzie's ownership. You would think there would be more news about the whereabouts, especially if it has been used to raise funds for charity. One would think the charity would at least have some mention of its presence at an event, or amounts raised because of it, but I haven't found anything. This is not the case with other owners, who are happy to publicize how their dresses have been used for good. Many have been loaned to Kensington Palace fashion exhibits. The Museum of Style Icons and Newbridge Silverware lent their replica dress for the Passion for Fashion 300 years of style exhibit at Blenheim Palace in 2017. One thing that makes me think it is still in Mr. Mackenzie's possession is, given the historic significance, it would cause a great stir if the original ever came up for auction.
But it is hard to know for sure. No media coverage mentioned it was a replica when it was auctioned in 2011. So, does Mr. Mackenzie still own the original Revenge dress? For now that remains a mystery.
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Sources
Christina Stambolian - My Story
Newbridge Silverware welcomes two of Princess Diana's most iconic garments
Princess Diana's Revenge Dress Dubbed 'Too Revealing' Auctioned for This Much Money
Newbridge Silverware - Princess Diana Style Icon
Princess Diana's famous Revenge Dress comes to Kildaire
Remembering Princess Diana: Her Fashion Legacy
Diana: Woman of Style by Jackie Modlinger
Dresses from the collection of Diana, Princess of Wales auction catalogue
In my quest to track down Diana's auctioned dresses to the current owners, I've started running into details I did not consider. Such is the case with this dress.
The Christina Stambolian isn't just any dress. It is famous as Diana's 'Revenge Dress.' She famously wore it in June 1994, on the night her husband confessed adultery on television. What should have been his moment to set a record straight, became the perfect moment for Diana to shine.
When the dress was designed, it was a one-and-only, special, made-to-measure for Diana. She had purchased it late summer 1991, but it would be three years before she wore it on that fateful night. At the time she was against black. Because the dress was so daring, she considered having it made in ivory, but she thought it would be too virginal. The short black, silk jacquard, off-the-shoulder dress with vee bodice falling onto a chiffon skirt, was made with Italian fabrics from Como. Paired with black tights, high heels and her famous sapphire, diamond and pearl choker, the dress was a showstopper.
The original dress was lot #2 at the 1997 Christie's auction. It was sold to Graeme and Briege Mackenzie of Gourock Scotland, for $74,000. The couple have used the dress to raise funds for Scottish charities. On Christina Stambolian's website, she confirms he purchased it. One article mentions he keeps the dress in a bank vault and brings it out as a big draw for major Scottish charity fundraisers. But he bought the dress over 20 years ago. Does he still own it? If not, where did it go from there?
I was excited when I tracked it down to the Museum of Style Icons and Newbridge Silver Museum in Kildaire, Ireland where it is on permanent exhibit. Or did I? As mentioned in previous posts, several of Diana's dresses have been auctioned multiple times, frequently by Kerry Taylor. The Revenge Dress is clearly labelled a 'replica,' in the March 17, 2011 Kerry Taylor auction catalogue. William Doyle, CEO of the museum, acquired the dress on display around the same time.
Embed from Getty Images
What is known, in 2010 Christina Stambolian created an exact replica of the revenge dress using the same material and Diana's measurements. Given the dress is identical, the Diana connection is there, whether she wore it or not. The replica comes with a letter of authenticity from the designer that this version and the one worn by Diana, are the only two in existence and she has no intention of producing more.
I have found little media coverage of Graeme's MacKenzie's ownership. You would think there would be more news about the whereabouts, especially if it has been used to raise funds for charity. One would think the charity would at least have some mention of its presence at an event, or amounts raised because of it, but I haven't found anything. This is not the case with other owners, who are happy to publicize how their dresses have been used for good. Many have been loaned to Kensington Palace fashion exhibits. The Museum of Style Icons and Newbridge Silverware lent their replica dress for the Passion for Fashion 300 years of style exhibit at Blenheim Palace in 2017. One thing that makes me think it is still in Mr. Mackenzie's possession is, given the historic significance, it would cause a great stir if the original ever came up for auction.
But it is hard to know for sure. No media coverage mentioned it was a replica when it was auctioned in 2011. So, does Mr. Mackenzie still own the original Revenge dress? For now that remains a mystery.
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Sources
Christina Stambolian - My Story
Newbridge Silverware welcomes two of Princess Diana's most iconic garments
Princess Diana's Revenge Dress Dubbed 'Too Revealing' Auctioned for This Much Money
Newbridge Silverware - Princess Diana Style Icon
Princess Diana's famous Revenge Dress comes to Kildaire
Remembering Princess Diana: Her Fashion Legacy
Diana: Woman of Style by Jackie Modlinger
Dresses from the collection of Diana, Princess of Wales auction catalogue
Monday, May 04, 2020
Whatever happened to Princess Diana's Dramatic Black Velvet Evening Gown by Bruce Oldfield?
Embed from Getty Images
Picture it. Diana, in all her 'Dynasty Di' glory, circa 1985. Alighting from her car, she is wearing a gloriously luxe black velvet gown by one of her favourite designers, Bruce Oldfield.
This dress has always been a favourite of mine. When I saw the dress for the first time at an exhibit in 1998, I wasn't sure it was the right one. Sure, it was black velvet, designed by Bruce Oldfield, but looking behind the dress, it had a black velvet rose with sparkling beads at the neckline. This detail is not apparent in photographs of Diana wearing it. But sure enough, it was there. According to the designer, the detail was added to prevent the dress from falling off Diana's shoulders.
Embed from Getty Images
It was ordered by Diana after her friend, fashion editor, Anna Harvey, wore a similar design. It has a deep v-neck in front and back, draped waist and lightly gathered skirt. It was worn in 1985 at The Barbican for the first night gala performance of Les Miserables. Diana also wore it in an official portrait by Lord Snowdon.
The dress was Lot #37 at the Christie's auction and purchased by Barbara Jordan, a Boston boutique owner. Ms. Jordan bought three dresses, paying $36,800 for the velvet Oldfield. She bought it to publicize her boutique by displaying the dresses in the window and after Diana's death, it became somewhat of a shrine. A noted philanthropist, Ms. Jordan donated the dress to a Boston AIDS charity. It was auctioned by Skinner Gallery in October 1997 and purchased by Maureen Rorech for $200,000.
This dress travelled the world in the Dresses for Humanity tour and was eventually auctioned in 2013. Historic Royal Palaces confirmed it had purchased the gown for $68,000.
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Sources
Bruce Oldfield Black Velvet Gown
Princess Diana's iconic dresses to go on display at Kensington Palace
DRESSES from the Collection of Diana, Princess of Wales auction catalogue
Dresses for Humanity exhibition catalogue
My Decade with Diana by Maureen Rorech Dunkel
Picture it. Diana, in all her 'Dynasty Di' glory, circa 1985. Alighting from her car, she is wearing a gloriously luxe black velvet gown by one of her favourite designers, Bruce Oldfield.
This dress has always been a favourite of mine. When I saw the dress for the first time at an exhibit in 1998, I wasn't sure it was the right one. Sure, it was black velvet, designed by Bruce Oldfield, but looking behind the dress, it had a black velvet rose with sparkling beads at the neckline. This detail is not apparent in photographs of Diana wearing it. But sure enough, it was there. According to the designer, the detail was added to prevent the dress from falling off Diana's shoulders.
Embed from Getty Images
It was ordered by Diana after her friend, fashion editor, Anna Harvey, wore a similar design. It has a deep v-neck in front and back, draped waist and lightly gathered skirt. It was worn in 1985 at The Barbican for the first night gala performance of Les Miserables. Diana also wore it in an official portrait by Lord Snowdon.
The dress was Lot #37 at the Christie's auction and purchased by Barbara Jordan, a Boston boutique owner. Ms. Jordan bought three dresses, paying $36,800 for the velvet Oldfield. She bought it to publicize her boutique by displaying the dresses in the window and after Diana's death, it became somewhat of a shrine. A noted philanthropist, Ms. Jordan donated the dress to a Boston AIDS charity. It was auctioned by Skinner Gallery in October 1997 and purchased by Maureen Rorech for $200,000.
This dress travelled the world in the Dresses for Humanity tour and was eventually auctioned in 2013. Historic Royal Palaces confirmed it had purchased the gown for $68,000.
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Sources
Bruce Oldfield Black Velvet Gown
Princess Diana's iconic dresses to go on display at Kensington Palace
DRESSES from the Collection of Diana, Princess of Wales auction catalogue
Dresses for Humanity exhibition catalogue
My Decade with Diana by Maureen Rorech Dunkel
Thursday, April 30, 2020
The Journey of Princess Diana's 'Elvis' Dress that launched a legal battle
Embed from Getty Images
After her wedding dress and the John Travolta dress, Diana's Elvis dress might be the third most well known of her outfits. Designed by Catherine Walker it is a remarkable example of craftsmanship and elegance, adding to the allure of an iconic princess.
After her wedding dress and the John Travolta dress, Diana's Elvis dress might be the third most well known of her outfits. Designed by Catherine Walker it is a remarkable example of craftsmanship and elegance, adding to the allure of an iconic princess.
The strapless sheath dress, in tinted white crepe silk, is embroidered with simulated pearls and white sequins. The jacket, with a stand up collar inspired by Elizabethan ruff, is edged in pearls. Designed for an official visit to Hong Kong in November 1989, the embroidery was by S. Lock Ltd. It was also worn for the British fashion awards in Albert Hall, London in 1989, in Budapest, and film premieres. Despite the original Elizabethan nod, it was nicknamed the 'Elvis dress.' It is estimated there are 20,000 hand embroidered pearls, and according to the designer, “What is not apparent from the pictures is the weight of the dress, which was immense“
Diana included the gown in her DRESSES from the Collection of Diana, Princess of Wales auction in June 1997. Prince William, who came up with the idea for the auction, thought the dress was ugly and reportedly said, "Mummy, it is too awful to sell." Thankfully Diana did not listen to him as the dress turned out to have the second highest bid. A Terrance Donovan photograph of Diana, wearing the gown and Lover's Knot tiara, is featured in the auction catalogue opposite a personal letter from Diana.
The dress was lot #78 at the auction. It sold for $151,000 to Lynda and Stewart Resnick, owners (at the time) of the Franklin Mint, as well as POM Wonderful and Fiji Water brands. According to court documents, when Lynda Resnick bought the dress at auction, ‘she did not intend to commercially exploit it.’
Nonetheless, the Resnick’s filed a trademark application on August 8, 1997 to produce “Diana - A forever Princess”, a 12-inch porcelain doll in a replica outfit. To ensure authenticity, Ms. Resnick had her staff count the beads so buyers would know the exact number on the original (22,000). The doll's dress was designed to scale with 2,000 hand-beaded fake pearls. The doll was an immediate hit and can still be found on eBay.
In September 1997, the Resnicks made further trademark applications to use various product titles, including ‘Diana, the People’s Princess,’ Diana, Queen of Hearts,’ Diana, Angel of Mercy' and more. The Diana, Princess of Wales, Memorial Fund, authorized by Diana's Estate as the only charity authorized to use Diana's name, likeness and marks, refused permission. Despite this, the Franklin Mint continued to use Diana's image, resulting in a trademark/right of publicity infringement lawsuit.
The case was settled out of court in 2004, but caused the Fund to freeze several grants. The Fund continued operations until 2013, when it was merged into The Royal Foundation. The irony of the situation is the Fund was hardly protective custodians of Diana’s image, squandering it by licensing several tacky items, including lottery scratch cards, scented candles, perfumes, memorial tartans and tubs of margarine.
Regardless of the controversy, it helped raise the profile of the dress and permanently ensure Diana’s connection to it. Unlike Diana's other gowns, which have come up for auction multiple times, the Elvis dress remained with the original owners. The Franklin Mint donated the dress to the Victoria and Albert museum in 2006, where it is currently in storage.
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you wish to use it for research purposes, a link to credit my work would be appreciated.
Sources
DRESSES from the Collection of Diana, Princess of Wales. Christie's auction catalogue
The Diana Chronicles by Tina Brown
Catherine Walker: An Autobiography by The Private Couturier to Diana, Princess of Wales
Tuesday, April 28, 2020
The Journey of Princess Diana's 'John Travolta' Dress
 |
| US Federal Government - Public Domain |
Aside from her wedding dress, few dresses from Diana, Princess of Wales, are as iconic as Victor Edelstein's ink blue silk velvet dinner dress. Inspired by Edwardian dinner dresses, the lightly boned bodice velvet dress is intricately draped with a bow at the waist and a slight bustle at the back with stiffened off-the-shoulder straps. The designer originally made the dress in burgundy, but Diana requested a change to midnight blue. Worn during a 1985 State dinner at the White House, where she famously danced with John Travolta. Accessorized with a sapphire and pearl choker and long satin gloves, it has been dubbed the 'John Travolta dress' ever since.
Embed from Getty Images
Diana wore the dress on at least five major occasions after that, including a State dinner in Germany in December 1987, the premiere of Wall Street in April 1988, and the Royal Opera House in 1991. Inspired by her son Prince William, the Travolta was one of seventy-nine dresses included in the Christie's DRESSES from the Collection of Diana, Princess of Wales auction in New York City on June 25, 1997. The catalogue included a photo by Lord Snowdon of her wearing the dress and her sapphire and pearl choker.
The Travolta dress, lot #79, sold for $222,500 (before the 15% Christie's surcharge), with the highest bid at the auction. At the time it was also one of the most expensive dresses ever sold at auction and the highest bid for an auctioned item of clothing. That record was previously held by John Travolta's famous white suit costume from Saturday Night Fever. Today it is held by Marilyn Monroe's iconic, 'Happy Birthday, Mr. President' dress she wore to serenade John F. Kennedy, at a 1962 Democratic fundraiser. Monroe's dress was bought by Ripley's Believe it or Not! in 2016, for $4.8 million. Diana's dress, for the most part, has avoided that kitschy fate.
Embed from Getty Images
The auction, catalogue sales and special events raised approximately $5.7 million. The seventy-nine dresses sold for $3,258,750. Proceeds from the auction were directed towards charities personally chosen by Diana. These charities were AIDS Crisis Trust and The Royal Marsden Hospital Cancer Fund, AIDS Care Centre, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, The Harvard AIDS Institute and The Evelyn H. Lauder Breast Centre of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
Fourteen of the dresses, including the Travolta dress, were purchased by an anonymous bidder, who was later identified as Maureen Rorech (later Maureen Rorech Dunkle). She purchased the dresses over the phone, as an investment; the largest collection for a single bidder. Because of the amount of dresses, Ms. Rorech had to charter a private jet to transport her collection from New York to Tampa, storing them in a vault.
After Diana's death, Ms. Rorech, set up the People's Princess Charitable Foundation, creating a global travelling exhibit called Dresses for Humanity, eventually raising more than $1.5 million for AIDS, cancer and children's charities. The exhibit toured the world in a variety of venues, including major museums and some less than glamorous locations. I have seen the collection of these dresses twice - when it originally came to Toronto in 1998 and at an exhibit at the Design Exchange, prior to its controversial sale at Waddington's Auction House in 2011. In March 2013, it was sold for the third time, selling for $311,000. It was purchased by an anonymous bidder as a gift for his wife.
Embed from Getty Images
It was included in the Diana: Her Fashion Story exhibit at Kensington Palace from February 2017-February 2019. In December 2019, Kerry Taylor Auctions included the dress as part of its Passion for Fashion sale. The dress was expected to sell for $450,000 but did not receive its reserve bidding price. It was eventually bought, post auction, for $290,000, by Historic Royal Palaces to join the Royal Ceremonial Dress Collection. Thus returning, after 22 years, to its original home at Kensington Palace.
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Sunday, January 12, 2020
Dear Harry and Meghan, think of the children
Sure, we think the Meghan and Harry debacle is bad, but fast forward 20 years from now.
With the older guard gone (RIP The Queen, Prince Philip, Charles, Camilla, Andrew, Edward, Sophie and all other minor royals). Anne at 90 is still kicking around, working past the age when she should be out to pasture. Beatrice, Eugenie, Louise and James, married with children of their own, happy to be free of the burdens George, Charlotte and Louis now face because of the 'Sandringham Summit 2020.' From this point forward, referred to simply as 'The Summit'.
Historians put January 13, 2020 as the moment everything changed for these children.
It is 2040, their parents, King William V and Queen Catherine are popular, but there are only so many patronages they can support. Without Harry and Meghan, the long touted slimmed down monarchy by Charles III is indeed slim now. Enter Prince George (27), Princess Charlotte (25) and Prince Louis (22).Young people who, under most circumstances, should be looking forward to lives of relative freedom, going to school, extended gap years, maybe an unfortunate trip to Las Vegas. All of this postponed, because of The Summit. Of course, they were too young to realize it at the time. No one thinks of the children in these instances, do they? Gan-Gan (Queen Elizabeth II) could relate. December 11, 1936, changed her destiny. Did anyone think of her? What she wanted? Did it matter?
In 2040, Harry and Meghan are not the power couple they once were. Long cut off from the Duchy of Cornwall funds, Brand Sussex meanders along. The Summit effectively made them pariahs to all but their fans. Settling down in Canada, the couple divide their time between London (Ontario) and Paris (Ontario). Archie and his sisters, Betty and Veronica are off, making woke speeches of their own, without having to worry about the consequences, or burdens of their first cousins across the pond.
If anyone understands those burdens, it is Uncle Harry. He went to great lengths to rid himself of it, before boarding a plane and heading for Canada. 20 years on, does he look to Princess Charlotte, now second in line (The Spare) with sympathy? His decision made her, and her brothers, working royals well before they should have become ones.
Maybe they look upon 'He whose name must not be spoken in royal circles,' with envy. Or a cautionary tale for what happens when one person gets what they wish for, and those who are left behind do not.
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
With the older guard gone (RIP The Queen, Prince Philip, Charles, Camilla, Andrew, Edward, Sophie and all other minor royals). Anne at 90 is still kicking around, working past the age when she should be out to pasture. Beatrice, Eugenie, Louise and James, married with children of their own, happy to be free of the burdens George, Charlotte and Louis now face because of the 'Sandringham Summit 2020.' From this point forward, referred to simply as 'The Summit'.
Historians put January 13, 2020 as the moment everything changed for these children.
It is 2040, their parents, King William V and Queen Catherine are popular, but there are only so many patronages they can support. Without Harry and Meghan, the long touted slimmed down monarchy by Charles III is indeed slim now. Enter Prince George (27), Princess Charlotte (25) and Prince Louis (22).Young people who, under most circumstances, should be looking forward to lives of relative freedom, going to school, extended gap years, maybe an unfortunate trip to Las Vegas. All of this postponed, because of The Summit. Of course, they were too young to realize it at the time. No one thinks of the children in these instances, do they? Gan-Gan (Queen Elizabeth II) could relate. December 11, 1936, changed her destiny. Did anyone think of her? What she wanted? Did it matter?
In 2040, Harry and Meghan are not the power couple they once were. Long cut off from the Duchy of Cornwall funds, Brand Sussex meanders along. The Summit effectively made them pariahs to all but their fans. Settling down in Canada, the couple divide their time between London (Ontario) and Paris (Ontario). Archie and his sisters, Betty and Veronica are off, making woke speeches of their own, without having to worry about the consequences, or burdens of their first cousins across the pond.
If anyone understands those burdens, it is Uncle Harry. He went to great lengths to rid himself of it, before boarding a plane and heading for Canada. 20 years on, does he look to Princess Charlotte, now second in line (The Spare) with sympathy? His decision made her, and her brothers, working royals well before they should have become ones.
Maybe they look upon 'He whose name must not be spoken in royal circles,' with envy. Or a cautionary tale for what happens when one person gets what they wish for, and those who are left behind do not.
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Thursday, January 09, 2020
If being royal is so extraordinary, why do the royals want to be ordinary?
Being royal is clearly not all it is cracked up to be. Gilt here and there. Liveried footmen abound. Church bells ring on your birthday. Red carpet magically appears, the car is always filled with gas, and almost everyone is happy to see you. But for some royals, it just isn't enough. The lure of something different is irresistible. A lure that cannot be filled by private planes and beautiful clothes. For some, the siren call of elevator music is just too much to resist. We have done such a good job downplaying regular existence, the royals can't help be intrigued. For Harry and Meghan, leaving it all behind and becoming one with the rest of us. Let us welcome them.
Dear Harry and Meghan,
Welcome to your new lives. You are now, one of us. You've bemoaned your regal existence long enough. Now you are free. There is so much to introduce you to. You have probably read about us (err...Commoners) in books, or seen us on TV, but to see us in person, is to truly be believed. We will introduce you slowly to the more wonderful parts of our lives.
Most people your age are financially independent already but we understand it has been different for you. Let me say, there is truly nothing like the feeling of paying bills. Embrace feeling of relief as you make payments on time. The exhilaration of worrying whether you have enough money to cover them. Will you have to choose between eating and paying rent? Every month is a new adventure.
Of course, being a 'working royal', in the literal sense, you will need to find a job. Prince or Duchess positions are limited, and well, you wanted something new didn't you? Why play it safe? Just imagine the wonderful feeling when you finally land a position. A cubicle to call your own. You may or may not have natural light. Or co-workers who clip their nails beside you. But you'll get a security card. Trust me, there's nothing more reassuring than hearing the door buzz open. When it does, you will enjoy the exclusive privileges that come with arrival. A computer, phone, desk, chair and you might even get free coffee. You'll have to bring your own stapler.
You will need to get to work. This means you either have a car or you take transit. You know, those overpacked buses and trains? No one and we mean no one, stands on ceremony. Every person for themselves, even the pregnant and elderly. Note, unlike in your previous life, you wait for transit, it doesn't wait for you.
You may find yourself waiting in line. When you buy food, go to the bank, or when you need to renew your passport. Standing in line can be challenging, especially if you have a small child with you who suddenly needs to go to the bathroom when you're at the front of the line. This always happens. Always. Remember to fill out all the paperwork. You will now have to look after all of this yourself. Don't be alarmed when you're asked to take a photo. It's just an ID. You might find it traumatizing but this is normal. No one looks good in those photos.
From time to time you will interact with others by phone. Like the rest of us, you may spend time 'on hold'. This is perfectly normal and to be expected. It is just like waiting in line but with better music. Sometimes you will wait for 10 minutes (rare), sometimes over an hour (common). You will get disconnected, or passed from person to person, or told to call another number. Finding a helpful person is challenging, but don't give up or you'll lose your magical place in line. Only to begin the adventure all over again. Exciting isn't it?
This is now your reality. For. The. Rest. Of. Your. Lives. Day in and day out. Until. You. Die.
Harry and Meghan, where are you going?? You wanted to be ordinary, right?? Right??
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Dear Harry and Meghan,
Welcome to your new lives. You are now, one of us. You've bemoaned your regal existence long enough. Now you are free. There is so much to introduce you to. You have probably read about us (err...Commoners) in books, or seen us on TV, but to see us in person, is to truly be believed. We will introduce you slowly to the more wonderful parts of our lives.
Most people your age are financially independent already but we understand it has been different for you. Let me say, there is truly nothing like the feeling of paying bills. Embrace feeling of relief as you make payments on time. The exhilaration of worrying whether you have enough money to cover them. Will you have to choose between eating and paying rent? Every month is a new adventure.
Of course, being a 'working royal', in the literal sense, you will need to find a job. Prince or Duchess positions are limited, and well, you wanted something new didn't you? Why play it safe? Just imagine the wonderful feeling when you finally land a position. A cubicle to call your own. You may or may not have natural light. Or co-workers who clip their nails beside you. But you'll get a security card. Trust me, there's nothing more reassuring than hearing the door buzz open. When it does, you will enjoy the exclusive privileges that come with arrival. A computer, phone, desk, chair and you might even get free coffee. You'll have to bring your own stapler.
You will need to get to work. This means you either have a car or you take transit. You know, those overpacked buses and trains? No one and we mean no one, stands on ceremony. Every person for themselves, even the pregnant and elderly. Note, unlike in your previous life, you wait for transit, it doesn't wait for you.
You may find yourself waiting in line. When you buy food, go to the bank, or when you need to renew your passport. Standing in line can be challenging, especially if you have a small child with you who suddenly needs to go to the bathroom when you're at the front of the line. This always happens. Always. Remember to fill out all the paperwork. You will now have to look after all of this yourself. Don't be alarmed when you're asked to take a photo. It's just an ID. You might find it traumatizing but this is normal. No one looks good in those photos.
From time to time you will interact with others by phone. Like the rest of us, you may spend time 'on hold'. This is perfectly normal and to be expected. It is just like waiting in line but with better music. Sometimes you will wait for 10 minutes (rare), sometimes over an hour (common). You will get disconnected, or passed from person to person, or told to call another number. Finding a helpful person is challenging, but don't give up or you'll lose your magical place in line. Only to begin the adventure all over again. Exciting isn't it?
This is now your reality. For. The. Rest. Of. Your. Lives. Day in and day out. Until. You. Die.
Harry and Meghan, where are you going?? You wanted to be ordinary, right?? Right??
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Tuesday, January 07, 2020
Places people, places! Harry and Meghan are back!
I normally refrain from voicing an opinion on Harry and Meghan without having an option for shelter. Especially on Twitter where a pile-on can be swift for those who dare to voice their opinions. Not all heroes wear capes. But if they did, they would be designed by Stella McCartney. Offering us protection in a stylish and sustainable way. Any other designer and you're on your own.
Yes, the unsung heroes. The Twitter warriors wading through the toxic battlefield so we don't have to. The next generation will thank us for their sacrifices against the immediate threat of a complete stranger's contrary opinion. Observing from above, the royal family is designing a medal. It will be called the Order of Think Before You Tweet. Don't you know there are wild-fires/starving children/poverty/environmental problems to remind others about?
This just in, Harry and Meghan have returned from their holidays. Places people, places! 7 days in to 2020 and we are off!
Harry and Meghan. Just the names make you suit-up. Oh those wacky Stans! Why can't they just understand? Or better yet, go away. Oh no, here they come! Block 'em and brag about being on the right side. Announcing you like Meghan and Catherine? (egads!) becomes just another thing to argue about. Why can't we just grab a coffee and hash it out?
Some say Harry and Meghan are to blame. They can't do anything right. Not when we've decided they're already wrong before they step off the plane. We wouldn't have to argue if they did what we demand they do, right? Could they handle things differently? Depends on who you ask. Today's controversy will be tomorrow's tally point. Sending mixed messages by publicly thanking people for a private holiday? Oh the humanity!
The story may change but one thing is consistent, our reaction to it.
[Insert action we don't like]...furious typing...snack..furious retweet...snack...furious typing...lunch break..furious retweet...dinner...Rinse and repeat next week.
Now that we're off, grab a comfy chair. I'm making popcorn, do you want some?
© Marilyn Braun 2020
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Thursday, January 10, 2019
Royal Focus: Royal Capricorns
Covering the period from December 21st to January 20th, Capricorn is the tenth sign in the zodiac. Capricorns are said to be hardworking, ambitious and determined. The British royal family have several members born under this sign:
Princess Alexandra, The Honourable Lady Ogilvy
Embed from Getty Images
Elegant, refined and a popular royal figure in her heyday. Princess Alexandra Helen Olga Christabel was born on December 25th, 1936 at 3 Belgrave Square in London. Her birth marked a high point in an otherwise bleak year marred by the abdication crisis. She is the daughter of Princess Marina, Duchess of Kent and Prince George, Duke of Kent. She has two brothers, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Prince Michael of Kent. She married Angus Ogilvy in 1963 and she has two children, James (1964) and Marina (1966) and four grandchildren.
Savannah Phillips
Embed from Getty Images
Born on December 29th, 2010. Savannah Anne Kathleen is the daughter of Peter Philips and Autumn Kelly. Her father is the son of the Princess Royal and first grandchild of the Queen. Savannah herself holds the distinction of being the Queen's first great-grandchild. She has a younger sister, Isla, born in 2012.
Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge
Embed from Getty Images
Born Catherine Elizabeth Middleton on January 9th, 1982 in Reading, she is the daughter of Michael and Carole Middleton. She has two younger siblings, Pippa and James. She married Prince William in 2011 and they have three children, Prince George (2013), Princess Charlotte (2015) and Prince Louis (2018)
Princess Michael of Kent
Embed from Getty Images
Tall, controversial and never boring, Princess Michael of Kent was born Baroness Marie Christine von Reibnitz on January 15th, 1945. She was previously married to Thomas Troubridge but the marriage ended in divorce in 1977 (the Pope would later grant her an annulment in 1978). She married Prince Michael of Kent on June 30th, 1978 in Vienna. At the time of their marriage, the Act of Settlement 1701 barred royals from marrying Roman Catholics and retaining their succession rights. As a result of their marriage, Prince Michael lost his place in line (15th). After the Succession to the Crown Act passed in 2013, he was reinstated and is now 34th in line. They have two children, Lord Frederick Windsor (1979) and Lady Gabriella Windsor (1981) and two granddaughters, Maud and Isabella.
Mia Tindall
Embed from Getty Images
Mia Grace, first child of Zara Phillips and her husband Mike Tindall, she was born on January 17th, 2014. She is the Queen's fourth great-grandchild. At the age of two, she made a scene stealing appearance proudly holding her 'gan-gan's' purse on the Annie Lebowitz portrait of the Queen with her younger grandchildren and great-grandchildren.
Sophie, Countess of Wessex
Embed from Getty Images
Sophie, Countess of Wessex was born Sophie Helen Rhys-Jones on January 20th, 1965 in Oxford. She is the daughter of Christopher Bournes Rhys-Jones and and the late Mary Rhys-Jones. She has one older brother, David. Prior to her marriage, she worked as a public relations professional, starting her own PR firm RJH Public Relations in 1996. She met Prince Edward in 1993 and they married in 1999. They have two children, Lady Louise Alice Elizabeth Mary Windsor (2003) and James Alexander Philip Theo, Viscount Severn (2007).
© Marilyn Braun 2019
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Princess Alexandra, The Honourable Lady Ogilvy
Embed from Getty Images
Elegant, refined and a popular royal figure in her heyday. Princess Alexandra Helen Olga Christabel was born on December 25th, 1936 at 3 Belgrave Square in London. Her birth marked a high point in an otherwise bleak year marred by the abdication crisis. She is the daughter of Princess Marina, Duchess of Kent and Prince George, Duke of Kent. She has two brothers, Prince Edward, Duke of Kent and Prince Michael of Kent. She married Angus Ogilvy in 1963 and she has two children, James (1964) and Marina (1966) and four grandchildren.
Savannah Phillips
Embed from Getty Images
Born on December 29th, 2010. Savannah Anne Kathleen is the daughter of Peter Philips and Autumn Kelly. Her father is the son of the Princess Royal and first grandchild of the Queen. Savannah herself holds the distinction of being the Queen's first great-grandchild. She has a younger sister, Isla, born in 2012.
Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge
Embed from Getty Images
Born Catherine Elizabeth Middleton on January 9th, 1982 in Reading, she is the daughter of Michael and Carole Middleton. She has two younger siblings, Pippa and James. She married Prince William in 2011 and they have three children, Prince George (2013), Princess Charlotte (2015) and Prince Louis (2018)
Princess Michael of Kent
Embed from Getty Images
Tall, controversial and never boring, Princess Michael of Kent was born Baroness Marie Christine von Reibnitz on January 15th, 1945. She was previously married to Thomas Troubridge but the marriage ended in divorce in 1977 (the Pope would later grant her an annulment in 1978). She married Prince Michael of Kent on June 30th, 1978 in Vienna. At the time of their marriage, the Act of Settlement 1701 barred royals from marrying Roman Catholics and retaining their succession rights. As a result of their marriage, Prince Michael lost his place in line (15th). After the Succession to the Crown Act passed in 2013, he was reinstated and is now 34th in line. They have two children, Lord Frederick Windsor (1979) and Lady Gabriella Windsor (1981) and two granddaughters, Maud and Isabella.
Mia Tindall
Embed from Getty Images
Mia Grace, first child of Zara Phillips and her husband Mike Tindall, she was born on January 17th, 2014. She is the Queen's fourth great-grandchild. At the age of two, she made a scene stealing appearance proudly holding her 'gan-gan's' purse on the Annie Lebowitz portrait of the Queen with her younger grandchildren and great-grandchildren.
Sophie, Countess of Wessex
Embed from Getty Images
Sophie, Countess of Wessex was born Sophie Helen Rhys-Jones on January 20th, 1965 in Oxford. She is the daughter of Christopher Bournes Rhys-Jones and and the late Mary Rhys-Jones. She has one older brother, David. Prior to her marriage, she worked as a public relations professional, starting her own PR firm RJH Public Relations in 1996. She met Prince Edward in 1993 and they married in 1999. They have two children, Lady Louise Alice Elizabeth Mary Windsor (2003) and James Alexander Philip Theo, Viscount Severn (2007).
© Marilyn Braun 2019
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Tuesday, July 10, 2018
Royal Christening: Prince Louis of Cambridge
Yesterday the public finally got a glimpse of the newest addition to the Cambridge family. Prince Louis Arthur Charles was born on April 23rd at St. Mary's Hospital Paddington and has not been seen since his parents left hospital with him on the day he was born. His older siblings, George and Charlotte attended his christening and so we got the chance to see for the Cambridge's as a family of five for the first time.
Embed from Getty Images
Prince Louis, at eleven weeks old slept peacefully in his mother's arms, unfazed by the special occasion. One of the few times he will have a good excuse for sleeping through a royal event. Like his older brother, Prince George, his christening took place in the Chapel Royal in St James's Palace. Their sister Princess Charlotte was christened in St. Mary Magdalene, Sandringham. A location with special meaning for her father as it was the same church her grandmother Diana, Princess of Wales was christened in 1961.
The Chapel Royal has seen many special royal events. Most recently, Meghan Markle (now Duchess of Sussex) was baptized and confirmed into the Church of England prior to her wedding. Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge was confirmed there in 2011.
It has seen its share of weddings, including Queen Victoria and Prince Albert in 1840. Their eldest daughter, Victoria, the Princess Royal married Prince Friedrich Wilhelm of Prussia (Later Emperor Friedrich III) in 1858. Victoria and Albert's grandson, Prince George, Duke of York married Princess May of Teck in 1893. They would go on to become King George V and Queen Mary.
This location also has special meaning for Prince William as it is where his mother's coffin rested prior to her funeral in 1997.
© Marilyn Braun 2018
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Embed from Getty Images
Prince Louis, at eleven weeks old slept peacefully in his mother's arms, unfazed by the special occasion. One of the few times he will have a good excuse for sleeping through a royal event. Like his older brother, Prince George, his christening took place in the Chapel Royal in St James's Palace. Their sister Princess Charlotte was christened in St. Mary Magdalene, Sandringham. A location with special meaning for her father as it was the same church her grandmother Diana, Princess of Wales was christened in 1961.
The Chapel Royal has seen many special royal events. Most recently, Meghan Markle (now Duchess of Sussex) was baptized and confirmed into the Church of England prior to her wedding. Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge was confirmed there in 2011.
It has seen its share of weddings, including Queen Victoria and Prince Albert in 1840. Their eldest daughter, Victoria, the Princess Royal married Prince Friedrich Wilhelm of Prussia (Later Emperor Friedrich III) in 1858. Victoria and Albert's grandson, Prince George, Duke of York married Princess May of Teck in 1893. They would go on to become King George V and Queen Mary.
This location also has special meaning for Prince William as it is where his mother's coffin rested prior to her funeral in 1997.
© Marilyn Braun 2018
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Monday, May 14, 2018
If you want to give Prince Harry and Meghan Markle a gift, give them a wedding day to call their own
So Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are getting married. Five days from now they will be husband and wife and this is the first blog article I am writing about them.
I would like to think that it is because I was a full-time student in school (which is true). During that time, royalty fell off my radar (As it should. I don't get marked on it). But this isn't completely true. In the lead up to the royal wedding and royal birth I have always had my toe in the water. Now that school is over, I can get caught up in the excitement. But unlike William and Catherine's wedding, I have found myself disillusioned at times.
Unlike royal weddings past where the speculation was over the top but harmless, now we are walking on egg shells. It is hard to blog about a royal wedding when you have to be careful about every word you write. Because nothing is sacred and every topic relating to the wedding has become bigger than Harry and Meghan. To the point where if their faces were not in the china, you could think there isn't a royal wedding at all. Everything topic is magnified and Harry and Meghan are no longer people. Meghan in particular. She represents something greater than flesh and blood. She has become a blank slate to project on to.
As Meghan is biracial, there is the discussion about race. There is no question this is an rampant issue. I've read some disgustingly vile statements from people who have never met her. On the other hand, expressing critical opinions or making innocuous statements can incur a wrath that doesn't encourage dialogue. Which, ironically is something Meghan would want there to be.
People find Meghan inspiring in their own ways. She can make a black feminist a fan of princesses and she has a little girl in her corner. She is also an inspiration for African American women in the work force. But some things are still not good enough. Such as the way Meghan chooses to style her hair.
Meghan's wedding invitations say 'Ms' and it is a feminist statement. She gives her mother a more prominent role in the wedding and she is sending an important message there too. It can't possibly be personal preference and a simple loving gesture. Meghan is not only planning a wedding for a global audience, she is also a proud feminist who has time to be all things to all people. Point one feminist wedding etiquette experts.
Then there is her family dynamic. It irks me when people who have never met her parents refer to Doria Ragland and Thomas Markle by their first names as if they have earned the right to that familiarity. Now her parents have become characters for public consumption. It was the same with the Spencer and Ferguson families: Bolting mothers, indiscreet relatives, affairs, and wicked step mothers. Oh my! Thankfully they did not have the internet to contend with. Meghan's parents do.
Speaking of Diana. No royal event is complete without her. Would she have approved? Will Meghan pay tribute to Diana's side by wearing the Spencer tiara? What message will she be sending if she does? Or doesn't? It also would not be a royal wedding without the Republican movement. Are Meghan and Harry their biggest threat? Stay tuned!
Now Meghan and Harry are changing royal wedding breakfast traditions. It is no longer a seated event. It now includes trendy bowl foods with seasonal vegetables! Expect a royal etiquette expert will critically weigh in on that in 3...2...1....
On May 19th I will be glued to the TV watching Prince Harry and Meghan Markle get married. I wish them all the happiness in the world. I wish for them to have a day free from being symbols and representing something greater than themselves. If you want to give them a gift, give them a day they can call their own.
© Marilyn Braun 2018
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
I would like to think that it is because I was a full-time student in school (which is true). During that time, royalty fell off my radar (As it should. I don't get marked on it). But this isn't completely true. In the lead up to the royal wedding and royal birth I have always had my toe in the water. Now that school is over, I can get caught up in the excitement. But unlike William and Catherine's wedding, I have found myself disillusioned at times.
Unlike royal weddings past where the speculation was over the top but harmless, now we are walking on egg shells. It is hard to blog about a royal wedding when you have to be careful about every word you write. Because nothing is sacred and every topic relating to the wedding has become bigger than Harry and Meghan. To the point where if their faces were not in the china, you could think there isn't a royal wedding at all. Everything topic is magnified and Harry and Meghan are no longer people. Meghan in particular. She represents something greater than flesh and blood. She has become a blank slate to project on to.
As Meghan is biracial, there is the discussion about race. There is no question this is an rampant issue. I've read some disgustingly vile statements from people who have never met her. On the other hand, expressing critical opinions or making innocuous statements can incur a wrath that doesn't encourage dialogue. Which, ironically is something Meghan would want there to be.
People find Meghan inspiring in their own ways. She can make a black feminist a fan of princesses and she has a little girl in her corner. She is also an inspiration for African American women in the work force. But some things are still not good enough. Such as the way Meghan chooses to style her hair.
Meghan's wedding invitations say 'Ms' and it is a feminist statement. She gives her mother a more prominent role in the wedding and she is sending an important message there too. It can't possibly be personal preference and a simple loving gesture. Meghan is not only planning a wedding for a global audience, she is also a proud feminist who has time to be all things to all people. Point one feminist wedding etiquette experts.
Then there is her family dynamic. It irks me when people who have never met her parents refer to Doria Ragland and Thomas Markle by their first names as if they have earned the right to that familiarity. Now her parents have become characters for public consumption. It was the same with the Spencer and Ferguson families: Bolting mothers, indiscreet relatives, affairs, and wicked step mothers. Oh my! Thankfully they did not have the internet to contend with. Meghan's parents do.
Speaking of Diana. No royal event is complete without her. Would she have approved? Will Meghan pay tribute to Diana's side by wearing the Spencer tiara? What message will she be sending if she does? Or doesn't? It also would not be a royal wedding without the Republican movement. Are Meghan and Harry their biggest threat? Stay tuned!
Now Meghan and Harry are changing royal wedding breakfast traditions. It is no longer a seated event. It now includes trendy bowl foods with seasonal vegetables! Expect a royal etiquette expert will critically weigh in on that in 3...2...1....
On May 19th I will be glued to the TV watching Prince Harry and Meghan Markle get married. I wish them all the happiness in the world. I wish for them to have a day free from being symbols and representing something greater than themselves. If you want to give them a gift, give them a day they can call their own.
© Marilyn Braun 2018
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Friday, April 27, 2018
Royal name sharing strikes again: Prince Louis Arthur Charles of Cambridge
 |
| By Allan Warren from Wikimedia Commons |
Prince Louis Arthur Charles and he will be formally known as HRH Prince Louis of Cambridge. Unlike Arthur, Louis was not a forerunner for baby names and it took royal watchers by surprise. Myself included.
Louis is a French name, meaning Famous Warrior. It was far more popular in the French royal family than the British one. Indeed, eighteen kings of France have borne the name. Not so for British ones. It is likely the baby was given the name in honour of Lord Louis, 1st Earl of Mountbatten, a formative figure in Prince Charles' life. He was assassinated by the IRA in 1979.
However, the name is still in the royal family. So far, the only member to have it as a first name is Louis Arthur Nicholas Felix, the youngest son of Lord Nicholas Windsor. Otherwise it is usually used as a middle name. It is shared by the following people:Prince William Arthur Philip Louis, Duke of Cambridge
Prince George Alexander Louis of Cambridge
Prince Edward Antony Richard Louis, Earl of Wessex
Lord Frederick Michael George David Louis of Kent, the son of Prince and Princess Michael of Kent
Albert Louis Philip Edward Windsor, older son of Lord Nicholas Windsor
It is also used for females, mainly as a middle name. Only one member of the family holds it as a first name: Lady Louise Windsor, daughter of the Earl and Countess of Wessex.
 |
| By Arnaud Bouissou [CC0], via Wikimedia Commons |
As with Charlotte Elizabeth Diana, William and Catherine are paying tribute to a grandparent, Charles means 'free-man' or 'manly' and several members of the royal family have it as a middle name.
© Marilyn Braun 2018
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Wednesday, April 25, 2018
How to choose a royal baby name for the new Prince of Cambridge
Choosing the name for a royal baby can be fraught with complexities we mere mortals can only imagine. In the oft chance the baby becomes monarch, a suitable name is required. No Apple, Dylan, North, Chicago or Dream, please. Instead, we have names imbrued with royal history that sound heavy, stale and old fashioned.
Because family tree names get recycled, sometimes royals are required to share them. In some cases, whether they like it or not. In Queen Victoria's day, she insisted that her female descendants bear the name Victoria and male line descendants, Albert. Although Albert is still around, the name Victoria is infrequently used. In its place, we have Elizabeth. Apparently you can never have enough Elizabeths in the family!
A forerunner for the new prince of Cambridge's name is Alexander. A nice and solid name, except for the fact that it has been used before. Should this cross the name off the list? Not so fast! Here are just a few of the royals who share Alexander and other names. In some cases, they share more than one.
Alexander
Prince George Alexander Louis of Cambridge
Alexander Patrick Gregers Richard, Earl of Ulster
Prince Richard Alexander Walter George, Duke of Gloucester
James Alexander Philip Theo, Viscount Severn
Edward
Prince Edward Antony Richard Louis, Earl of Wessex
Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward, Duke of York
Prince Edward George Nicholas Paul Patrick, Duke of Kent
Lord Nicholas Charles Edward Jonathan Windsor
Elizabeth
Princess Anne Elizabeth Alice Louise, Princess Royal
Princess Charlotte Elizabeth Diana of Cambridge
Princess Beatrice Elizabeth Mary of York
Zara Anne Elizabeth Tindall
Lady Louise Alice Elizabeth Mary Windsor
Lady Sarah Frances Elizabeth Chatto
Lady Davina Elizabeth Alice Benedikte Lewis
Lady Margarita Elizabeth Rose Alleyne Armstrong Jones
James
James Alexander Philip Theo, Viscount Severn
James Ogilvy
Nicholas
Prince Edward George Nicholas Paul Patrick, Duke of Kent
Lord Nicholas Charles Edward Jonathan Windsor
George Philip Nicholas, Earl of St Andrews
Charles
Prince Charles Philip Arthur George, Prince of Wales
Prince Henry Charles Albert David of Wales
David Albert Charles Armstrong-Jones, Earl of Snowdon
Charles Patrick Inigo Armstrong-Jones, Viscount Linley
Lord Nicholas Charles Edward Jonathan Windsor
Philip
Prince Charles Philip Arthur George, Prince of Wales
Prince William Arthur Philip Louis, Duke of Cambridge
James Alexander Philip Theo, Viscount Severn
George
Prince George Alexander Louis of Cambridge
Prince Charles Philip Arthur George, Prince of Wales
George Philip Nicholas, Earl of St Andrews
Prince Edward George Nicholas Paul Patrick, Duke of Kent
© Marilyn Braun 2018
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Because family tree names get recycled, sometimes royals are required to share them. In some cases, whether they like it or not. In Queen Victoria's day, she insisted that her female descendants bear the name Victoria and male line descendants, Albert. Although Albert is still around, the name Victoria is infrequently used. In its place, we have Elizabeth. Apparently you can never have enough Elizabeths in the family!
A forerunner for the new prince of Cambridge's name is Alexander. A nice and solid name, except for the fact that it has been used before. Should this cross the name off the list? Not so fast! Here are just a few of the royals who share Alexander and other names. In some cases, they share more than one.
Alexander
Prince George Alexander Louis of Cambridge
Alexander Patrick Gregers Richard, Earl of Ulster
Prince Richard Alexander Walter George, Duke of Gloucester
James Alexander Philip Theo, Viscount Severn
Edward
Prince Edward Antony Richard Louis, Earl of Wessex
Prince Andrew Albert Christian Edward, Duke of York
Prince Edward George Nicholas Paul Patrick, Duke of Kent
Lord Nicholas Charles Edward Jonathan Windsor
Elizabeth
Princess Anne Elizabeth Alice Louise, Princess Royal
Princess Charlotte Elizabeth Diana of Cambridge
Princess Beatrice Elizabeth Mary of York
Zara Anne Elizabeth Tindall
Lady Louise Alice Elizabeth Mary Windsor
Lady Sarah Frances Elizabeth Chatto
Lady Davina Elizabeth Alice Benedikte Lewis
Lady Margarita Elizabeth Rose Alleyne Armstrong Jones
James
James Alexander Philip Theo, Viscount Severn
James Ogilvy
Nicholas
Prince Edward George Nicholas Paul Patrick, Duke of Kent
Lord Nicholas Charles Edward Jonathan Windsor
George Philip Nicholas, Earl of St Andrews
Charles
Prince Charles Philip Arthur George, Prince of Wales
Prince Henry Charles Albert David of Wales
David Albert Charles Armstrong-Jones, Earl of Snowdon
Charles Patrick Inigo Armstrong-Jones, Viscount Linley
Lord Nicholas Charles Edward Jonathan Windsor
Philip
Prince Charles Philip Arthur George, Prince of Wales
Prince William Arthur Philip Louis, Duke of Cambridge
James Alexander Philip Theo, Viscount Severn
George
Prince George Alexander Louis of Cambridge
Prince Charles Philip Arthur George, Prince of Wales
George Philip Nicholas, Earl of St Andrews
Prince Edward George Nicholas Paul Patrick, Duke of Kent
© Marilyn Braun 2018
Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Tuesday, April 24, 2018
It's a Prince!
After an uneventful pregnancy and birth, Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, gave birth to her third child, a son. The as yet unnamed prince is fifth in line to the throne. Here he is, sound asleep, oblivious to his royal pedigree and the challenges he will face because of it.
Isn't he a cutie?
Embed from Getty Images
© Marilyn Braun 2018 Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Isn't he a cutie?
Embed from Getty Images
© Marilyn Braun 2018 Thank you for enjoying this article. If you use the information for research purposes, a link to credit the work I've put into writing it would be appreciated.
Popular Posts
-
Aside from books that have yet to be released, or ones I've waited until they've ended up in the bargain bin, I can't say I'... -
Best known as the mother of Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York, she was part of a family that can trace their ancestry back to 1557. Born on ...
-
When I was in my twenties, I spent the large part of it being confused with who I was and what I was supposed to be doing with my life. Toda...
-
6 - 8 oz spaghetti Parmesan Cheese For the Bolognese sauce: 1 can tomatoes 1 small can tomato puree approx 6 oz minced beef 2 oz mushrooms, ... -
Fresh off my post encouraging Catherine to develop her royal role sooner rather than later, imagine my chagrin when discovering an article i...
-
On this episode, new ways to enjoy the royal wedding with a friend, who is waging war on 'moronic muzak'? On his wedding day, what p...
-
Diana, Princess of Wales has recently been named on Time Europe magazine's issue 60 Years of Heroes. Personally I was quite surprised at...
-
Y'know, I don't have a problem with artwork. As a matter of fact, I go to the museum at least a couple of times a year to make mysel...
