If you check the top left hand corner of the blog, just above recent articles, you'll see that I welcome questions on royalty. I love answering them, and sometimes I even learn something new. I recently received questions from two different people. Why am I mentioning this? Well, the questions were almost identical - Who is of higher rank, a prince or a duke?
Since this question seems to be so popular, I thought I'd post it here in case anyone else was wondering the same thing.
So, who does rank higher?
Well, it's easy to say that a prince ranks higher than a duke. However, there are two types of Duke's in the United Kingdom - Royal Duke's and noble (non-royal) Duke's.
It is customary, on the marriage of the sons of a sovereign, to be given a Dukedom upon their marriage. The Queen did this with Prince Andrew (Duke of York) in 1986 and Prince Edward (Earl of Wessex - to be created Duke of Edinburgh after his father's death), upon his marriage in 1999. The Prince of Wales, as the eldest son of the sovereign, automatically became Duke of Cornwall upon his mother's accession in 1952, making him the most senior of dukes. Therefore he was not given any titles when he married in 1981.
Although there is nothing that defines these titles as exclusive to the royal family or makes them royal in general, any available dukedom, created by the sovereign for one of her sons, could become a royal dukedom. These royal dukedom's, which unlike other dukedoms, do not come with any estate or property. A good example of this would be the Duke of Windsor, which was simply a title. As such, because they are royal dukedoms, they rank higher than that of an "ordinary" older dukedom.
So a prince, whether a royal duke or not, ranks higher than a noble duke, which is the highest rank, just below that of a king or a prince.
Thanks for your questions ladies!
© Marilyn Braun 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Contact Form
Featured Post
If being royal is so extraordinary, why do the royals want to be ordinary?
Being royal is clearly not all it is cracked up to be. Gilt here and there. Liveried footmen abound. Church bells ring on your birthday. Red...
Search This Blog
Popular Posts
-
Y'know, I don't have a problem with artwork. As a matter of fact, I go to the museum at least a couple of times a year to make mysel...
-
When Princess Charlotte is christened on Sunday July 5th, she will traditionally be given five or six godparents/sponsors. Prince William ha...
-
"Diamonds are a girl's best friend", and so the song goes. But royal engagement rings are somewhat different. Despite some fab...
-
Periodically you will see a variation of this question in media articles, usually when there's no news to report. However, by asking thi...
-
It was so close I could have touched it. Dress by Catherine Walker Circa 1992 I didn't but I could have. One of the famous dresse...
-
She was born on April 25, 1897 in Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee year. Queen Victoria called her "My dear little Jubilee baby...
-
Diana, Princess of Wales has recently been named on Time Europe magazine's issue 60 Years of Heroes. Personally I was quite surprised at...
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(132)
-
▼
May
(14)
- Operation Queen Camilla
- Is Chelsy Davy 'The One' for us?
- Why I'm sad Prince Harry is not going to war
- Royal Review: The Way We Were, Remembering Diana b...
- Question: Rank of the Royal Ladies
- Royal Focus: Victoria Day
- Survivor Balmoral - Day 31
- A Danish Princess is born
- The Reign of Glamour
- Question: The Queen's Pearls
- Question: Who is of higher rank, a prince or a duke?
- Greeting The Queen - A guide for the U.S. visit
- The Queen's American Visit
- Royal Birthdays
-
▼
May
(14)
No comments:
Post a Comment