Well, Charles and Camilla have arrived in Canada and by the lack of coverage and enthusiasm you'd think they'd made a one hour stop over on their way to a warmer climate. Maybe we take the royals for granted, they're on our currency so seeing them in person is no big deal.
This visit, Charles 15th and Camilla's first, should receive more coverage, because it should have the curiosity factor - 'ah, that's what the third person in Diana's marriage looks like.' So far it hasn't but it doesn't hurt Charles. Let's be honest, Charles is not the drawing card he once was. And during his first visit in 1970 he had his parents and sister with him to guarantee people would come out. With the exception of the Queen, Charles on tour works better as a double-act. Bring someone attactive or higher ranking with him and he can't lose. Arrive by himself and, well who really cares, right? The minor royals suffer this indignity all of the time. Edward and Sophie were in our midst in June and had Hello! Canada not shown photos I wouldn't have been any the wiser. It's that bad.
So I'm taking control of this deplorable state of affairs and doing my own coverage. Or as much as I can do without actually accompanying them on tour. Forgive me for being a few days behind - they're already on Day 3! But I shall try to make up for it.
Stay tuned!
© Marilyn Braun 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Contact Form
Featured Post
If being royal is so extraordinary, why do the royals want to be ordinary?
Being royal is clearly not all it is cracked up to be. Gilt here and there. Liveried footmen abound. Church bells ring on your birthday. Red...
Search This Blog
- Embed from Getty...Sep 19 2022 | Read more
- Lambert, CC BY-SA 2.0 , WikipediaAs details emerge regarding Queen...Sep 14 2022 | Read more
- The Queen died on Thursday, September 8th. At 96, it wasn't a shock....Sep 11 2022 | Read more
- As an avid follower of the British royal family, I have seen more...May 03 2022 | Read more
- As with anything Harry and Meghan do, when they named their newborn...Jun 09 2021 | Read more
Popular Posts
-
Recent reports indicate that Prince William and Kate Middleton are back together. Earlier in the year, speculation was rife that an engageme...
-
Do you have a royal blog? Would you like to discover other cool blogs and have some fun interacting with other royal bloggers in the proces...
-
Periodically you will see a variation of this question in media articles, usually when there's no news to report. However, by asking thi...
-
Prince Harry recently celebrated his 21st birthday, and in right royal tradition, he marked it by giving an interview and releasing photos; ...
-
I'm expecting my second child in early December (when I'll have time to update this blog, and look after a toddler and newborn is so...
-
Y'know, I don't have a problem with artwork. As a matter of fact, I go to the museum at least a couple of times a year to make mysel...
-
Dear Visitor, If you're a visitor to my blog (or if you subscribe to a service that let's you know when I've changed it), you ma...
-
Why didn't Prince Henry, Duke of Gloucester become king when George VI died? By everything that I know, as the next male in succession, ...
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(97)
-
▼
November
(16)
- The Royal Romance Report - Sunday November 29th, 2009
- Caption this photo!
- The Royal Report for Sunday November 22nd, 2009 - ...
- Charles and Camilla's Canadian Royal Tour - Day 10...
- Charles and Camilla's Canadian Royal Tour - Day 9
- Charles and Camilla's Royal Tour - Day 7 & 8
- Charles and Camilla's Canadian Royal Tour - Day 6
- Charles and Camilla's Canadian Royal Tour - Day 5
- Question: Charles and Camilla's poppies
- The Royal Report for Sunday November 8, 2009 - The...
- Charles and Camilla's Canadian Royal Tour - Day 4
- Charles and Camilla's Canadian Royal Tour - Day 3 ...
- Charles and Camilla's Canadian Royal Tour - Day 3
- Charles and Camilla's Canadian Royal Tour - Day 2
- Charles and Camilla's Canadian Royal Tour - Day 1
- Charles and Camilla's Canadian Royal Tour Coverage
-
▼
November
(16)
No comments:
Post a Comment