Since Diana died in 1997 there has been a void in the world of royalty - that of a great princess. Many accomplished women have married into the royal family but none seem likely to make the same impact that Diana did. Is Diana the last of the great princesses? Has she set the bar too high for other royal brides?
You can listen to the podcast here.
Tune in live to the next Royal Report on Sunday July 6th, 2008 9:00PM EST (North America).
The topic will be: A recent report revealed that the British monarchy costs taxpayers 66 pence per year (or about $1.79 CDN). Less than the cost of an iPOD download or a cup of Starbucks coffee. Are they worth it? Would you sacrifice a cup of coffee to pay for them? What gives better value, a Starbucks coffee or the British Monarchy?
© Marilyn Braun 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Contact Form
Featured Post
If being royal is so extraordinary, why do the royals want to be ordinary?
Being royal is clearly not all it is cracked up to be. Gilt here and there. Liveried footmen abound. Church bells ring on your birthday. Red...
Search This Blog
Popular Posts
-
I've written several reviews for this blog but I don't believe I've ever written one about a magazine. Given the amount of inter...
-
Since the reign of King George IV, most sovereigns have created a form of royal family order for members of the royal family, usually female...
-
I'm all for being a law abiding citizen. It works for me. But when recent news reports trumpeted Kate Middleton with a cell phone in her...
-
Today is a historic day for the monarchy in the Netherlands. Queen Beatrix announced that she would abdicate in favor of her son, Prince Wil...
-
Ah love.... There is nothing like a royal romance. The pattern is predictable: the media goes into hot-pursuit with intrusive coverage, th...
-
Catherine has mastered the royal wave. She can graciously accept flowers from small children and present shamrocks with élan. Her ability to...
-
Y'know, I don't have a problem with artwork. As a matter of fact, I go to the museum at least a couple of times a year to make mysel...
-
As I mentioned in my article on Royal weddings , the dress is the centerpiece of the day. I covered some history regarding the dress, howeve...
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(125)
-
▼
June
(14)
- The Royal Report for Sunday June 29th, 2008: Is Di...
- Question: What is an Earl?
- Royal Engagements
- The Royal Report for Sunday June 22, 2008 - Should...
- Upcoming Royal Report: Should Kate Middleton get a...
- Royal Recipe: Scones
- Does Kate Middleton know what she's getting hersel...
- The Royal Report for Sunday June 15th, 2008: Royal...
- Upcoming Royal Report: Royal News - Fact or Fiction?
- Royal Profile: Captain Alexander Ramsay of Mar
- I Like Prince Charles
- Someday your prince may come but more than likely ...
- How Royal is Royal?
- Survivor Balmoral - Day 34
-
▼
June
(14)
1 comment:
I do not think she is the last of the great princesses but the last of her kind. All of the princesses that have come after her have benefited in some regards to how she humanized the royal family but there is also some drawbacks because a lot of the mystic is gone too. She made it okay for the prince to marry the regular girl. The princesses that have come after have the "common" connection between them but in reality the Queen mother was the first high profile commoner to marry into that world- in this century. The British media is trying to make prince William's girlfriend into a star but whoever he ends up with will have to create her own persona. She cannot let the media do it for her. The Duchess of Cornwall has done well in portraying an image of graceful aging and it is sometimes hard to match her with the woman so many reviled during and following Diana's death.
I personally think that the "modern" princess can learn something from the royal women of the last century and turn of the century. These women were truly great. We look at them and they carry the power, history, duty of their status with grace. They rarely seemed uncomfortable. They were always impeccably dressed and had the right balance between familiarity and privacy with their subjects. There was no confusing royalty with celebrity. They simply embodied what they were... Royal.
Post a Comment