Thursday, August 14, 2008

The Changing Face of Royalty

When I was a little girl, my image of what a Princess should be came from Cinderella and Princess Diana. It would be easy to think that Disney's representation of Cinderella is the definitive image, but as I grew up and became more familiar with world royalty I realized that this is not the reality. Times have changed and now we see Princess Tiana, the first black Disney princess, in the upcoming film The Princess and the Frog.

There are many examples of how royalty has changed: Princess Maxima of the Netherlands is from Buenos Aires, Grand Duchess Maria Theresa of Luxembourg is from Cuba, When Lady Rose Windsor, daughter of the Duke and Duchess of Gloucester, married Gary Lewis, he became the first person of Māori descent to marry into the British royal family. Peter Phillips' bride, Autumn Kelly became the first Canadian to do so. Alexandra Manley, born in Hong Kong, became a significant addition to Denmark's ruling family when she married Prince Joachim in 1995. She was the first person of Asian heritage to marry into a sitting European ruling house. They have since divorced and Alexandra is now titled Alexandra, Countess of Frederiksborg. Another example, though lesser known, is Princess Angela of Liechtenstein, currently the only black princess in a reigning European house.

Royalty has come a long way from the times where they could only marry royalty. It was not considered proper for them to marry outside of their class. If they did so, it was usually without permission of the sovereign. Usually they were stripped of title, rank or the like and their marriages were known as morganatic. As the years went by, and many royal houses fell by the wayside, available royal spouses grew scarce. Therefore spouses were chosen from the aristocracy. Despite her pedigree, in 1923 Lady Elizabeth Bowes Lyon became the first commoner to marry into the royal family in several centuries. In 2001 Prince Haakon of Norway married Mette-Marit Tjessem Høiby, a single mother and former waitress. In 2004, Prince Felipe of Spain married Letizia Ortiz, who had been previously married in a civil ceremony. In 2005, Camilla Parker Bowles married Prince Charles. What once would never have been allowed, let alone considered, now seems to be commonplace. And even a reflection of reality.

The inspiration for this article came from an email I received about Princess Angela of Liechtenstein. That as the first black princess in a European dynasty, she received little media recognition. Indeed, prior to that email I wasn't even aware of her. Unfortunately I couldn't find enough unique information to do a royal profile but I had to wonder, should people gain recognition solely based on who they are married to? People may be proud to have their heritage represented in public figures, but, in itself, marrying into royalty isn't necessarily an accomplishment. It's something few people can aspire to. Some might consider it a step backward. Giving up who you are as an individual to be put on a wobbly pedestal? Is it worth it? When you are only defined by who you are married to what happens to the person you were before it? Marrying royalty can even be seen as an unrealistic goal better left to the imagination of Hollywood film-makers. The person who emailed wondered whether race was a factor in the lack of media coverage of her. I think this is less about race and more about the low profile of the royal family she married into. In fact, she isn't even mentioned on the official site. Read what you will into that.

I don't necessarily think that any of these women have changed the way people look at royalty. Meaning they haven't made royalty more accessible or promoted any greater understanding of civil marriages, single parenthood, divorce, race, or even their respective nationalities. It was inevitable for royalty to marry commoners but that doesn't make it remarkable. Autumn Kelly, as the first Canadian to marry into the British royal family, doesn't change anything for me. It doesn't fill me with any sense of national pride. Nor should it.

Cinderella and Princess Tiana are characters from a Disney film. Neither reflects reality. Royal women of today are accomplished, poised and multicultural. Regardless of their background, they have become assets to their respective royal dynasties.

Let's hope that never changes.

© Marilyn Braun 2008

Related articles:

A Cinderella Story
Royal Profile - Princess Battenberg

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I really admire Prince Maximilian for marrying Angela. She's brilliant and I think many of his peers would not have considered her for one reason alone. They definitely get the award for being the most undercover high profile couple ever. Shame on the press for not covering them more, but I think the Liechtensteins prefer it that way.

Lyndem said...

I like this article but it confuses me. As we seem to be agreeing on many things here that we are not on the other one!

You say marrying royalty is not an accomplishment and yet I love and was obsessed with Princess Di and that was the reason why. I knew nothing of her before that and I've rarely heard that liking her for this reason is bad-yet liking Princess Angela because she married a prince and happens to look like me is being called bad.


I will take your advice on writing a blog article but it won't be just about Angela since royalty is not what I write about. I do write about women's issues and so I think I will write about how important images of beauty are to young girls and stick with us into adulthood. It seems people don't get why its important to women of color that other women of color be seen as beautiful.

In your words "It may be superficial" but its the reality of the matter!