Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Contact Form
Featured Post
If being royal is so extraordinary, why do the royals want to be ordinary?
Being royal is clearly not all it is cracked up to be. Gilt here and there. Liveried footmen abound. Church bells ring on your birthday. Red...
Search This Blog
Popular Posts
-
Embed from Getty Images As mentioned in a previous post, Diana elevated diplomatic dressing to an art form. This dress is another excelle...
-
You may be wondering why I'm writing a profile on a Norwegian monarch. In fact, there are strong ties between the British and Norwegian ...
-
Royalty have their image on stamps and commemorative items. Some more notable royals have buildings, docks, and streets that bear their name...
-
Kate Middleton...err..Catherine Cambridge cannot put a foot wrong ... She is beautiful, everything a princess is supposed to be... She ...
-
Captain Alexander Ramsay of Mar died on the eve of his 81st birthday on December 20, 2000. At the time of his death "Sandy" was on...
-
Scott Scott has asked: Whats the difference between a 'House' and a Dynasty? What is The Queen's House, Dynasty and surname? Tha...
-
Seeing recent photos of Camilla, I have to say I'm speechless. Once again, the transformation of Camilla is striking; she looks lovelier...
-
Prince Michael George Charles Franklin was born on July 4, 1942 at the family home, Coppins, near Iver in Buckinghamshire. The last name w...
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(125)
-
▼
January
(11)
- Royal Review: Someday my Prince Will Come by Jerra...
- Recommended Books: Royal Jewels
- The Royal Report - Has Paul Burrell cooked his own...
- Upcoming Royal Report - Sunday January 27th, 2008
- Diana's mother love is nothing new
- The Royal Report - Should Princesses Beatrice & Eu...
- Upcoming Royal Report - Sunday January 20th, 2008
- Adventures in New York City
- What's wrong with wanting to be a princess?
- The Royal Report for Sunday January 6, 2008 - Do t...
- Upcoming Royal Report - Sunday January 6, 2008
-
▼
January
(11)
3 comments:
Hi Marilyn,
Welcome back and Happy New Years to you. Your report wasn't clear and it was very hard to hear you but I will just answer your question. The royals do have a right to complain about their privacy and lives. The worlds press has somehow made the Windsors into celebrities and they are far from that. As we can see, William & Kate is doing just fine but the press has a way of making these two people lives very difficult and you can tell that they don't like their relationship to be the hot topic. Charles & Diana had to deal with the pressures from the media and in result their marriage crumbled. It was just too many hands in that marriage. They really do have a right to complain. If people just realize that they are human beings just like the rest of us and leave their private lives alone, things will be okay but not perfect.
Hi Claudius,
Happy New Year to you and thanks for the feedback!
I'm not sure that they have a right to complain about their lives, excessively anyways. I think that's just part and parcel of the position that they're in.
I'm not trying to justify abusive behavior from the press, like Diana went through, or say that the royals have to stay in their palaces and never venture out. True the media didn't have a right to put so much pressure on Charles and Diana but there were also things - like Camilla, to factor in as well.
I don't think it's realistic to expect them to have their private lives to remain private. With the celebrity culture we seem to be living in at the moment, it's unrealistic.
They are public figures, notable people - which is the definition of a celebrity. It's a fact, even if people like Paris Hilton have 'corrupted' the definition of it.
For anyone interested, I have re-recorded the January 6th show. Not the same as the original but at least you should be able to hear me now! :)
Thanks again Claudius for letting me know about this. I don't normally listen the shows afterwards so I wouldn't have known otherwise.
Post a Comment