National rejoicing greeted the birth of a male heir to the Japanese Chrysanthemum throne today. The first male born to the family since 1965. The birth of the unnamed prince effectively ends any move to revise the succession laws to allow Princess Aiko, the only child of the Crown Prince and Princess of Japan to succeed. Of course it is certainly politically correct for politicians to say that the debate will continue, paying lip service to the female population of Japan, who today had further confirmation of the inequality of their sex. However, tradition trumps change and progress.
When Princess Aiko was born in 2001, eight years after the marriage of her parents, it sparked a succession crisis which seemed inevitable until it was announced in February that Princess Kiko, wife of the second son of the Emperor was pregnant with her third child. Princess Aiko as a female could not, according to the present succession laws, succeed to the throne.
Thankfully Aiko, at four years old, is too young to fully realize what she's lost. The opportunity to make a change. To be a symbol of equality to Japanese women. Her parents may be relieved that she doesn't have to shoulder the burden of such a lofty position, but as the first and only child of the Crown Prince and Princess she has been deprived of a birthright otherwise denied to her because of her sex.
Should this new child have been a girl, Aiko might still have had a chance. Now we can only wonder what might have been. The new prince is now third in line to the throne, behind his uncle, the Crown Prince and his father. The status quo has been maintained and traditionalists can breathe a sigh of relief until the next generation. One thing is for certain, we have not heard the last of this issue.
© Marilyn Braun 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Embed from Getty Images As mentioned in a previous post, Diana elevated diplomatic dressing to an art form. This dress is another excelle... -
You may be wondering why I'm writing a profile on a Norwegian monarch. In fact, there are strong ties between the British and Norwegian ...
-
Royalty have their image on stamps and commemorative items. Some more notable royals have buildings, docks, and streets that bear their name...
-
Kate Middleton...err..Catherine Cambridge cannot put a foot wrong ... She is beautiful, everything a princess is supposed to be... She ...
-
Captain Alexander Ramsay of Mar died on the eve of his 81st birthday on December 20, 2000. At the time of his death "Sandy" was on...
-
Scott Scott has asked: Whats the difference between a 'House' and a Dynasty? What is The Queen's House, Dynasty and surname? Tha...
-
Seeing recent photos of Camilla, I have to say I'm speechless. Once again, the transformation of Camilla is striking; she looks lovelier...
-
Prince Michael George Charles Franklin was born on July 4, 1942 at the family home, Coppins, near Iver in Buckinghamshire. The last name w...
5 comments:
Sad that in today's world the Japanese are ahead with technology and backwards when it comes to sex and equality for woman.
As an American, it is fascinating to me a country that still has issues with succession to the throne, based on the gender of a child.
What I would normally take for granted, I find it amazing just how big of a country altering change a female successor to the throne would be.
It's said to think of what Princess Aiko has missed out on, and the opportunity for change that was taken her, before she was old to even defend her right to it.
I think it is all very suspicious myself. Kiko was so pressured into this pregnancy. And I can't help thinking the Japanese believe that their country was founded by a woman, Amaterasu. What happened?
Trudie said...
Sad that in today's world the Japanese are ahead with technology and backwards when it comes to sex and equality for woman.
Well said, Trudie. I feel saddest for the mother. I wonder if she has much intellectual stimulation? It must be heartbreaking for her that her role in life now is one of egg donor rather than using her intelligence and skills.
Perhaps that's just me. I personally couldn't be satisfied with that life. It sounds so limiting.
I think Princess Aiko is lucky. She won't have to spend her entire life attending official functions. I doubt she'll get much freedom but she may not get so much pressure to marry and produce an heir at the earliest opportunity.
I also find it interesting that a country so technologically ahead is still behind in this area.
I wonder how the Japanese people feel about it. Do they see this as much of an issue as we do?
Post a Comment